Use of Air Force firepower in anti-Naxal operations (Part I)
October 20th, 2009 - 7:34 pm ICT by ANIAttn: News Editors/News Desks: Following is an article by former Vice-Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal S.G. Inamdar. We do hope it will be of interest to your publication.
By Air Marshal S.G.InamdarNew Delhi: We have used Air Force firepower with telling, if not decisive, effect in the past, in serious insurgency situations bordering on armed revolt/ secession, in the ’60s, in a part of our country. It is nothing new. Those decisions must have been hard to take and painful to arrive at, at the highest political levels; what perhaps helped was that, after a certain stage, it was largely the Army, and not the CPF, which was doing the bulk of the fighting on the ground; the scenarios had turned into a quasi-war one and time was fast running out. Once the decisions were taken, the go-aheads given and the overall guidelines spelt out clearly by govt, the Air Force & the Army were left pretty much alone to do their own joint planning, prioritizing and execution. They used the AF fire power most astutely, judiciously, conservatively and correctly to avoid collateral damage beyond a point, mindless mayhem and wanton destruction of civilian life and property. I state this from first-hand experience, observation and knowledge. Air Mshls Trevor Osman, Anil Trikha, ‘Mian’ Naqvi, AVMs ‘Goofy’ Gupta, ‘Guni’ Sehgal etc will bear me out on that.Not using the Air Force fire power when and in the manner in which it was used at the time, would, to my mind, have been disastrous for the nation. Merely using it in the logistics, communication, transportation of men & materiel, surveillance, air maintenance and casualty evacuation roles wasn’t getting us the needed dividends. As it was revealed once peace and order were restored to those troubled areas later on, aerial firepower could not have been used more opportunely and appropriately; it, along with the Army ground action, possibly pulled a lot of political chestnuts out of the fire just in time, shortened the conflict very considerably and nipped in the bud what would have turned into a serious challenge to India’s integrity! I’d like to believe that it also served as a major and punishing lesson to the then and future separatists, without and most importantly, estranging the populace.
(Cont.)
- Naxals in Dantewada have 'surprised' us 'sooner than later' - Apr 08, 2010
- Naxals in Dantewada have 'surprised' us 'sooner than later' (Article) - Apr 08, 2010
- Use of Air Force firepower in anti-Naxal operations - Oct 21, 2009
- Use of Air Force firepower in anti-Naxal operations (Part II) - Oct 20, 2009
- Fighter procurement for dummies: Ashley Tellis does it again! (Part-3) - Feb 13, 2011
- Apex court anguished over Rs.80 pension to major's widow - Sep 17, 2010
- Pakistan-Multiple Crises (Part I) - Jan 06, 2011
- Killing of Osama bin Laden has rehabilitated reputation of US Government, officials - May 04, 2011
- India, China to undertake joint air exercise in 2012: IAF chief - Feb 23, 2010
- Pakistan gets new ISI chief, air chief (Lead) - Mar 19, 2012
- India, Pakistan and the Kashmiri struggle - Feb 28, 2011
- Pakistan-Multiple Crises (Part II) - Jan 06, 2011
- Indian Army chief-designate conferred medal for distinguished service - Apr 17, 2012
- Contradictions thrive in Jammu and Kashmir - Oct 09, 2010
- India concerned over 42 terror camps exiting in Pak - Feb 28, 2010
Tags: air marshal, air staff, avms, casualty evacuation, collateral damage, cpf, decisive effect, fire power, guni, mian, mindless mayhem, naqvi, news desks, news editors, peace and order, quasi war, sehgal, troubled areas, vice chief, wanton destruction