More babies would harm Oz economy, warns govt watchdogAugust 6th, 2008 - 2:27 pm ICT by ANI
Melbourne , Aug 6 (ANI): Aussie couples may soon be asked to curb any plans to have a third baby, for the nation’’s productivity watchdog has warned that a further increase in the birth rate would actually harm the economy and not improve it.
While a major analysis of the nation’’s increasing fertility rate indicated that it has reached at its highest level for 25 years, the Productivity Commission has cautioned that a further increase may aggravate the problem of the ageing of the population instead of solving it.
Thats because it will actually make the women move out of the workforce for taking care of the babies, depressing labour supply and reducing the taxation base as the population ages.
However, the commission said that the small number of extra babies born wouldnt make much of a difference to the rate of population ageing.
Also, new mothers would be further worsening the financial impacts on the government of the ageing of the population because the tax breaks offered to parents to have children occur up front.
On the other hand, the cost savings of a bigger working population and bigger tax base from extra children are put off until they are of working age.
The warning comes in line with the report expected next month, which delves into whether the nation should adopt a paid maternity leave scheme. It found that 5000 dollars baby bonus, which is expected to be rolled into any new paid maternity leave scheme, didnt have much of a role to play in lifting the fertility rate.
However, the baby bonus equalled to only a 1 per cent reduction in the lifetime costs of a first child, which would cost its parents at least 385,000 dollars over its lifetime.
“Any significant fertility effect from the bonus would suggest the presence of short-sightedness by parents about the lifetime costs of raising children,” the Daily Telegraph quoted the report, as saying.
According to the commission, the Family Tax Benefit payments (on average 5000 dollars per family per year) were more likely to have had a bigger impact on lifting the national fertility rate.
With these payments, the cost of children was cut by 8 per cent per year and the generosity of these benefits increased significantly after 2000.
Over 285,000 births were registered last year, the highest level in 25 years, and the commission referred to it as a catch-up effect as women deferred childbirth to later in life.
“Having reached older ages, they are now having these postponed babies,” said the commission.
The commission said that the fertility rate would escalate further but for the effects of high house prices and better educated women. (ANI)
- Pregnancy killing a million girls every year: Report - Jun 28, 2012
- Fertility rate declines in Karnataka: Expert - Oct 27, 2011
- China sticks to one-child norm - Sep 27, 2010
- India's population is 1.21 billion, gender imbalance worsens (Roundup) - Mar 31, 2011
- North India's population growth rising steeply: NGO - Jul 11, 2011
- Living in a city makes you fat, infertile, depressed - Nov 22, 2011
- Haryana to tax Gurgaon-Alwar road users more - Jul 27, 2011
- Himachal Pradesh to spend more on health - Mar 21, 2012
- Expecting parents appeal for faster baby benefits - Aug 22, 2008
- Fertility figure Cerne Abbas Giant 'inspires' baby boom - Jul 27, 2010
- Half of Indian kids under five underweight: NGO - Feb 15, 2012
- Older parents are happier with more kids: Study - Mar 08, 2011
- Petrol prices to be hiked by 70 paise from midnight (Second Lead) - Jul 23, 2012
- Parents can spur kids' activity by example - Aug 01, 2012
- Realty industry has little to cheer from budget (Comment) - Mar 18, 2012
Tags: ageing, babies, baby bonus, birth rate, daily telegraph, family tax benefit, family tax benefit payments, fertility rate, increasing fertility, labour supply, lifetime costs, maternity, melbourne, new mothers, population ages, productivity commission, short sightedness, taxation, watchdog, workforce