Lifestyle and geography play major role in gene evolutionApril 23rd, 2008 - 12:48 pm ICT by admin
Washington, April 23 (ANI): Geneticists at the North Carolina State University have given scientific backing to the nurture side of the nature vs. nurture debate, by showing that environmental factors such as lifestyle and geography play a major role in whether certain genes are turned on or off.
The NC State researchers, Youssef Idaghdour, an NC State graduate student in genetics and a Fulbright scholar, and Dr. Greg Gibson, formerly William Neal Reynolds Professor of Genetics at NC State and currently a faculty member at the University of Queensland in Australia, discovered that people with the same genetic makeup can be in different environments and have different expression profiles.
By studying gene expression of white blood cells in 46 Moroccan Amazighs, or Berbers including desert nomads, mountain agrarians and coastal urban dwellers the NC State researchers and collaborators in Morocco and the United States showed that up to one-third of genes are differentially expressed due to where and how the Moroccan Amazighs live.
The researchers set out to study the impact of the transition from traditional to urbanized lifestyles on the human immune system. They used the latest tools for characterizing the sequence and expression of all 23,000 human genes to compare the three Moroccan Amazigh groups.
These groups were chosen because they have a similar genetic makeup but lead distinct ways of life and occupy different geographic domains. Thus, differences in gene expression profiles between the three groups would likely be due to environmental and not genetic factors.
The team uncovered specific genes and pathways that are affected by lifestyle and geography. For example, they found respiratory genes were upregulated, or turned on, more frequently in the urban population than in the nomadic or agrarian populations.
Idaghdour said that this makes sense as urban dwellers deal with greater amounts of pollution in the city and encounter more difficulties with diseases like asthma and bronchitis. So it stands to reason that certain respiratory genes in city dwellers go into overdrive while staying quiet in rural and nomadic populations, he added.
The NC State researchers also examined every gene in each of the three populations and found very few genetic differences, positing that these limited differences were unlikely to explain the large gene expression differences.
Although Idaghdour initially hypothesized that environmental factors would play a role in gene expression, he didn’t expect such large differences. About 30 percent of genes were differentially expressed between urban dwellers and mountain agrarians.
“The most important implication of this study is that people with the same genetic makeup can be in different environments and have different expression profiles,” Idaghdour said.
“The same gene can be expressed in the city but not in a rural place because of the environment. So you must look at the environment when studying associations between genes and disease, he added.
The research is published in the journal PLoS Genetics. (ANI)
Tags: agrarians, amazigh, desert nomads, fulbright scholar, gene evolution, gene expression profiles, genetic makeup, geographic domains, greg gibson, human genes, human immune system, nature vs nurture, nature vs nurture debate, nc state graduate, neal reynolds professor, north carolina state university, state researchers, university of queensland, white blood cells, william neal reynolds