India reacts strongly to British parliamentary debate on KashmirSeptember 15th, 2011 - 8:37 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Sep 15 (IANS) Reacting to the House of Commons debating alleged human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir, India Thursday reminded British MPs that it was the world’s largest democracy in which all 1.2 billion people exercise their freedom as a fundamental right.
India said it has taken “due note”, which means an adverse reaction in diplomatic parlance, of the debate in the Commons.
It also explained that if there were any aberrations on the issue of human rights, the nation had “enough, effective” mechanisms within the democratic framework to address any grievance.
“We take due note of the proposed debate in the UK House of Commons later today (Thursday), which we believe is an initiative of back-bencher MPs and does not reflect the position of the UK Government,” external affairs ministry spokesperson Vishnu Prakash told reporters here while responding to a query.
“It also suffice to say India is a vibrant democracy, largest democracy in the world, which fully respects the rule of law and human rights. Civil liberties and freedoms are enshrined in the Constitution of India as fundamental rights and are available….not only available, but exercised by each and every individual across the length and breadth of the country of 1.2 billion people,” he said.
Meanwhile, a government source said India had enough, effective systems within its democratic framework to address any grievance or aberration.
“If there is aberration, there are enough mechanisms, effective mechanisms within our system, our democratic framework to address any grievance or any aberration.”
The Commons has scheduled a general debate on alleged human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir, for which Conservative MP Steve Baker, along with four other MPs, have given notice.
India has already conveyed to Britain that the debate “will not be helpful”.
Reports suggested that Baker possibly faced pressure from roughly 6,000 constituents from Pakistani Kashmir, to take up Kashmir’s “cause” in the Commons.
Other MPs who helped Baker secure the debate — Jason McCartney and Andrew Griffiths, both Conservative and Denis MacShane and Nic Dakin (both Labour) — are also from constituencies with numerically-strong Pakistani Kashmir voters.
Baker’s notice for a debate seeks to force the British government to raise the issue of alleged human rights violations in Kashmir with India.
The MP had also requested a vote on the debate, but this was rejected by House of Commons Backbench Business Committee.
The British foreign office, however, has remained silent on the debate as yet.
- Rage as Cameron welcomes Bahrain crown prince - May 20, 2011
- CPI to government: address alienation of Kashmiris - Aug 26, 2010
- British MPs found guilty of accepting free foreign jaunts - Mar 23, 2010
- Kashmiri youth seek demilitarisation, more dialogue - Jun 03, 2012
- India asks Pakistan to end illegal occupation of Kashmir - Sep 23, 2010
- Why Kashmiris want the hated AFSPA to go - Nov 20, 2011
- India denies condoning torture after WikiLeaks expose (Roundup) - Dec 17, 2010
- Text of Rahul Gandhi's speech in parliament - Aug 26, 2011
- 'Aberrations' dealt quickly by existing legal mechanisms: India - Dec 17, 2010
- Kashmir's first national literature festival put off - Aug 29, 2011
- Government unveils bill for time-bound public services - Nov 02, 2011
- Firmly reject those mocking democratic institutions: PM (Lead) - May 13, 2012
- EU asks Bangladesh to address human rights violations - Jul 22, 2012
- Text of PM's statement in parliament - Dec 27, 2011
- RTI can check corruption: Experts - Oct 16, 2011
Tags: aberration, aberrations, adverse reaction, british mps, british parliamentary debate, civil liberties, conservative mp, constitution of india, democracy in the world, democratic framework, external affairs ministry, fundamental right, government source, human rights violations, jammu and kashmir, kashmir india, largest democracy in the world, notice india, steve baker, vibrant democracy