India must not sign CTBT as Pokhran II was not fully successful, says DRDO scientist
August 27th, 2009 - 12:03 pm ICT by ANINew Delhi, Aug.27 (ANI): A senior scientist and DRDO representative at Pokhran II has admitted for the first time that the May 1998 nuclear tests may not have been as successful as has been projected.
K Santhanam, who was director for 1998 test site preparations, told the Times of India in an interview that the yield of thermonuclear explosions was actually much below expectations and the tests were perhaps more a fizzle rather than a big bang.
In nuclear parlance, a test is described as a fizzle when it fails to meet the desired yield.
Santhanam said the yield for the thermonuclear test, or hydrogen bomb in popular usage, was much lower than what was claimed. Santhanam also said that given this fact, India should not rush into signing the CTBT.
He emphasized the need for India to conduct more tests to improve its nuclear weapon programme.
The test was said to have yielded 45 kilotons (KT) but was challenged by western experts who said it was not more than 20 KT.
The exact yield of the thermonuclear explosion is important as during the heated debate on the India- US nuclear deal, it was strenuously argued by the government’s top scientists that no more tests were required for the weapons programme. It was said the disincentives the nuclear deal imposed on testing would not really matter as further tests were not required.
According to security expert Bharat Karnad, Santhanam’s admission is remarkable because this is the first time a nuclear scientist and one closely associated with the 1998 tests has disavowed the government line.
“This means the government has to do something. Either you don’t have a thermonuclear deterrent or prove that you have it, if you claim to have it,’ said Karnad.
The yield of the thermonuclear device test in 1998 has led to much debate and while western experts have stated that it was not as claimed, BARC has maintained that it stands by its assessment.
Indian scientists had claimed after the test that the thermonuclear device gave a total yield of 45 KT, 15 KT from the fission trigger and 30 KT from the fusion process and that the theoretical yield of the device (200 KT) was reduced to 45 KT in order to minimise seismic damage to villages near the test range.
British experts, however, later challenged the claims saying that the actual combined yield for the fission device and thermonuclear bomb was not more than 20 KT. (ANI)
- Defence Ministry rejects scientist's stand Pokhran II success, says nuke strength sufficient - Aug 27, 2009
- Former NSA Brajesh Mishra says Pokhran II was successful - Aug 27, 2009
- Now, Navy chief disagrees with DRDO scientist's Pokhran failure remark - Aug 27, 2009
- Army should be confident of India's nuclear arsenal: Kakodkar - Dec 13, 2009
- No need for Pokhran II controversy: PM - Aug 29, 2009
- India possesses nuclear deterrence, Pokhran II tests were successful: Navy Chief - Aug 27, 2009
- 1998 tests perfect, no doubt about India's n-arsenal: Kakodkar (Lead) - Dec 13, 2009
- Santhanam sticks to guns - 1998 thermonuclear test was a dud (Lead, with Images) - Sep 21, 2009
- Kalam defends India's nuclear deterrence capability (Second Lead) - Aug 27, 2009
- India's n-tests raises questions, 'puzzles' government (Lead) - Aug 27, 2009
- India's n-tests were success, no repeat needed: top scientists (Lead) - Sep 24, 2009
- India has thermonuclear capabilities: NSA - Sep 20, 2009
- Pokhran II was a success: Kakodkar - Sep 24, 2009
- No CTBT, India needs more nuclear tests: Pokhran II coordinator - Aug 27, 2009
- Reassure army of nuke capabilities: former military chief - Sep 06, 2009
Tags: big bang, ctbt, device test, fizzle, government line, hydrogen bomb, nuclear deal, nuclear scientist, nuclear tests, nuclear weapon, parlance, pokhran, santhanam, security expert, thermonuclear device, thermonuclear explosion, thermonuclear explosions, thermonuclear test, times of india, western experts