Fat injections can give reconstructed breasts smoother, softer appearance
October 9th, 2008 - 2:41 pm ICT by ANI - Send to a friend:Washington, Oct 9 (ANI): A new study has revealed that injecting fat after breast reconstruction to correct implant wrinkling or dimpling may be safe and effective to improve breast shape.
However, using fat injections for cosmetic breast enhancement is still controversial.
“The initial implant reconstruction sometimes leaves them with contour deformities or wrinkling, but fat injections can correct these problems and give their breasts a smoother, softer, more natural appearance,” said Gregory Scott, MD, ASPS Member Surgeon and study co-author.
For the study, the researchers looked at 21 patients who had 42 fat transfers for contour deformities or wrinkling. The injections were performed an average of 9.9 months following reconstruction and the fat was taken from the patients” abdomen or upper thighs.
The researchers found that fat injection to the breast for reconstruction is safe, improves breast shape, and corrects implant wrinkling.
The study will be presented at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Plastic Surgery 2008 conference, Oct. 31 Nov. 5, in Chicago.
While fat injection in breast reconstruction is more accepted because there is no breast tissue left after mastectomy, cosmetic use of fat injections to the breast remains controversial.
At Plastic Surgery 2008, a panel will discuss and analyze the medical and legal risks, patient safety implications, as well as potential benefits of cosmetic fat injections to the breast.
Two reasons noted for the controversy: one, fat can “calcify” in the breast and obscure mammograms or possibly be mistaken for fibrous cancer growths.
Two, it is unknown how much fat is needed to adequately enlarge a breast, if and how much of the injected fat will be absorbed by the body, or how much time the procedure will take.
“Based on current reports these procedures are taking multiple hours in the operating room and yielding minimal enlargement, you really need to wonder how useful and safe that is for the patient,” William P. Adams, Jr., member of the ASPS Emerging Trends Committee and panel presenter.
“Nevertheless, this is all still unknown. For that reason, we need to wait until the issue has been studied in a controlled, scientific environment,” he added. (ANI)
Related Stories
- 98pc of elective mastectomy patients ”would do it again” - July 8, 2008
- Breast reconstruction surgery rarely discussed with patients before treatment - December 23, 2007
- Now, a procedure that hides bulge surgery scars below bra-line - September 13, 2008
- Now, a procedure that hides bulge surgery scars below bra-line (Re-issue) - September 14, 2008
- Now, a ”no breast implant” technique to correct deflated ”pancake” breasts - October 9, 2008
- ‘Beauty enhancing implants have side-effects’ - May 20, 2008
- Brit womens take on breasts more generous than their US counterparts - June 5, 2008
- Cheek fat will wipe years off your face - May 28, 2008
- Heres how to get cheeks like Angelina Jolie - May 28, 2008
- Here’s how to get yourself some sexy celeb cheeks - June 25, 2008
- Love your lower belly fat, for its rich in stem cells - July 24, 2008
- Love your lower belly fat, for its rich in stem cells (Re-issue) - July 27, 2008
- Breast cancer treatment effective in women with implants - December 1, 2008
- Beware of malnutrition, if you are going in for body contouring surgery - November 13, 2008
- Cosmetic skin fillers may cause delayed adverse effects - May 20, 2008
- National
- asps member surgeon
- breast enhancement
- breast reconstruction
- breast shape
- breast tissue
- conference oct
- contour
- current reports
- deformities
- gregory scott
- implant reconstruction
- mammograms
- mastectomy
- minimal enlargement
- natural appearance
- operating room
- patient safety
- safety implications
- society of plastic surgeons
- upper thighs
Posted in National, |

