Didn’t know about chargesheet against Thomas, says former CVCMarch 4th, 2011 - 2:24 pm ICT by ANI
New Delhi, Mar 4 (ANI): Former Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) Pratyush Sinha has said that he was not aware of the chargesheet against PJ Thomas while clearing his name as Kerala Chief Secretary in 2007.
The clearance formed the basis for selection of Thomas as CVC in 2008.
“If someone had told us, that would have made us think,” Pratyush Sinha told Hindustan Times on Thursday.
The CVC’s vigilance clearance was the primary defence of the Central Government in and outside the Supreme Court for appointing Thomas to lead the watchdog.
Thomas, who is facing a corruption case in a Kerala court, handed over his resignation to the government on Thursday after the Supreme Court struck down his appointment as Central Vigilance Commissioner.
Thomas had sent his resignation to the Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. His lawyer has stated that Thomas will ask for a review of the judgement.
A three-judge bench headed by the Chief Justice of India SH Kapadia delivered its verdict on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought removal of Thomas from the position of CVC.
The apex court, which had on February 10 reserved its judgement on petitions challenging the appointment of Thomas, said the appointment was illegal and that he must go. The apex court further said criminal case should have been considered.
Earlier, a bench of Chief Justice S H Kapadia reserved their orders after hearing arguments from various sides, including those presented by Prashant Bhushan, counsel for the petitioner, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, Thomas’s counsel KK Venugopal and Attorney General GE Vahanvati.
Thomas, through senior advocate K K Venugopal, had earlier argued that he fulfilled the eligibility criteria prescribed for the CVC’s post and the court could not take into account the pending chargesheet to fault him on grounds of impeccable integrity since it was not part of the qualifications prescribed under the CVC Act.
The Centre for Public Interest Litigation, an NGO and others had earlier challenged Thomas’s appointment as the CVC, quoting the Palmolein import corruption case in which Thomas is an accused. (ANI)
- CVC Thomas resigns after Supreme Court tells him to go - Mar 03, 2011
- BJP claims victory on PJ Thomas verdict, says Government 'stands exposed' - Mar 03, 2011
- Thomas ceases to be CVC, new CVC in due time: Moily - Mar 04, 2011
- Supreme Court strikes down appointment of PJ Thomas - Mar 03, 2011
- CVC case: Supreme Court verdict on PJ Thomas tomorrow - Mar 02, 2011
- Final verdict on PJ Thomas today - Mar 03, 2011
- Prime Minister takes responsibility for Thomas' appointment as CVC - Mar 04, 2011
- Supreme Court serves notice to CVC Thomas - Dec 06, 2010
- Supreme Court to hear plea against CVC Thomas's appointment - Dec 06, 2010
- Sushma Swaraj satisfied with PM owning responsibility over CVC fiasco - Mar 04, 2011
- Sacked CVC Thomas to file review petition before Supreme Court - Mar 12, 2011
- CVC appointment was an error of judgement: Manmohan Singh - Mar 07, 2011
- SC verdict on Thomas 'vindicates great national aspiration': Jaitley - Mar 03, 2011
- Can examine lapses in CVC's appointment: Apex court - Feb 08, 2011
- CVC fiasco: PM's statement in Parliament incorrect, says Yechury - Mar 11, 2011
Tags: apex court, central government, chief justice of india, chief secretary, commissioner thomas, corruption case, criminal case, dr manmohan singh, eligibility criteria, hindustan times, impeccable integrity, kapadia, manmohan, manmohan singh, petitioner, pil, public interest litigation, sinha, venugopal, vigilance