Blame game over Dr Haneef terrorism case breaks out Down UnderOctober 24th, 2008 - 5:01 pm ICT by ANI
Sydney , Oct 24 (ANI): The Australian Federal Police (AFP) have reportedly passed the obligation of charging Dr Mohamed Haneef with terrorism on to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP).
In a submission to the Clarke inquiry into the case, the AFP said that while the decision to charge Dr Haneef ultimately rested with it, the CDPPs legal advice was a fundamental factor in the decision-making process to charge Dr Haneef.
The police submission further said the decision to drop the charge against Dr Haneef 11 days later was also taken by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
Prior to the receipt of the advice from the CDPP, the AFP was of the view that there was not enough evidence to charge, The Age quoted the AFP as saying.
But, the AFPs submission contrasts with the CDPPs submission made to the inquiry in August, which had that the police had pressured a prosecutor for reassurance that Dr Haneef could be charged.
The key period under dispute is between July 12 last year, when the AFP started briefing Commonwealth prosecutors on possible charges, and July 14, when Dr Haneef was charged. The police submission had conceded that on July 12, the AFP incorrectly told the prosecutors that a mobile phone SIM card belonging to Dr Haneef was found in the possession of Kafeel Ahmed, who was arrested at the site of a failed terrorist attack at Glasgow airport. But it said they issued a correction the next day after receiving fresh information from the British police that the card was in the possession of another man.
They say the updated advice was included in a 49-page written brief that Commonwealth prosecutors studied for several hours on July 13, but that the prosecutors still advised that there was sufficient evidence to charge Dr Haneef.
And, Dr Haneef was charged the next day.
The police submission said that the prosecutors made two incorrect statements to the court when charging Dr Haneef, including the whereabouts of Dr Haneef’’s SIM card. They said that they were not in court, and, so, were not in an immediate position to correct the prosecutors, and only found out about the incorrect statements through the media. (ANI)
- Australia apologises to Indian-origin doctor - Dec 23, 2010
- Aussie Police had found jihadist materials in Dr Haneefs flat after arrest - Oct 23, 2008
- Australia is good place to live, says Haneef - Dec 18, 2010
- Oz Govt. agrees to give Indian origin doctor substantial payout for wrong terror allegation - Dec 21, 2010
- Dr. Haneef says 'traumatic' wrongful arrest in Oz marred his 'family-career' reputation - Dec 17, 2010
- Haneef's lawyer silent on '$1m Oz Govt compensation' Indian media report claim - Dec 22, 2010
- Haneef to get 'substantial' compensation from Australia - Dec 21, 2010
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef eyeing huge payout from Oz govt. over 2007 ordeal - Dec 18, 2010
- Oz Polices secret file had no incriminating terror evidence against Dr Haneef - Aug 15, 2008
- Haneef posed no threat, says Australian security agency - Jul 29, 2008
- Oz Govt. issues formal apology to Indian-origin Dr. Haneef over wrongful arrest - Dec 23, 2010
- Oz Police knew they lacked evidence before Dr Haneef was charged for terror - Oct 16, 2008
- Indian-origin Dr. Mohamed Haneef returning back to Australia for compensation talks - Nov 22, 2010
- We have learnt from Indian doctor Haneef case: Top Australian official - Sep 07, 2009
- Haneef case: Oz federal police accused of withholding information - Aug 20, 2008
Tags: ahmed, australian federal police, british police, commonwealth director of public prosecutions, contrasts, director of public prosecutions, dr haneef, dr mohamed, fundamental factor, glasgow airport, incorrect statements, july 14, legal advice, mohamed haneef, possession, prosecutor, prosecutors, reassurance, sim card, terrorist attack