No conclusive link between cell phone use, cancer: Pulitzer winner
April 20th, 2011 - 12:29 pm ICT by IANSWashington, April 20 (IANS) Indian American cancer specialist, Siddhartha Mukherjee who won a 2011 Pulitzer Prize for his very first book, says there is no conclusive study linking the use of cell phones to brain cancer.
But no study conclusively ruled it out, either, says Mukherjee, an assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University.
Mukherjee’s book “The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer” won him the coveted honour.
“Finding a causal agent for cancer is not like solving a mathematical equation. It’s not like there is a single magical formula that will allow us to find and define a cancer-causing agent or carcinogen,” he told US National Public Radio (NPR) Tuesday.
Instead, he said, carcinogens are identified “through a process that really resembles solving a detective case, in which you take one piece of evidence, you add another piece of evidence and often you’re looking for corroborative pieces of evidence”.
The dramatic increase in cell phone use over the past two decades, Mukherjee said, has “almost (created) a natural experiment because if the cell phones truly contain a carcinogen, then increasing cell phone use dramatically, as has happened, should increase the rate of development of brain cancers in America”.
But that “natural experiment” has not provided any evidence of a link, he says. Two major studies, he explains, show the rate of brain cancers between 1992 and the mid-2000s have “essentially remained flat”.
A subsequent study found a small increase in tumours in women and not in men, but the increase was small - from 2.5 cases per 100,000 people to 2.6 cases per 100,000 - and occurred in the brain’s frontal lobe.
That is not “the part of a brain that we typically think is associated with holding a cell phone. It’s not near neither of the ears”, Mukherjee was quoted as saying.
Given the small numbers of cases and the very large numbers of participants involved in the study, Mukherjee said the incidence is likely to be a random fluctuation.
“You’re vastly more likely, I suspect, to die of an accident because of the misuse of the cellphone while driving” than to develop a brain tumour.
He hopes that two major trials under way in the US and Europe eventually “will settle the issue once and for all. But thus far, I would say the evidence remains pretty negative”.
(Arun Kumar can be contacted at arun.kumar@ians.in)
- WHO study on cancer from cell phones outdated: Experts - Jun 02, 2011
- Mobile-phone use not linked to increased brain cancer risk - Feb 18, 2011
- WHO panel sees potential link between cell phones, brain cancer - Jun 01, 2011
- Cell phone use does affect brain but health consequences unknown - Feb 23, 2011
- New drugs to kill cancers minus side-effects - May 21, 2012
- Diabetes drug reduces cancer risk - Nov 27, 2011
- Fresh evidence links mobile phone use to brain tumours - Nov 02, 2010
- Cellphone holding shows your dominant side of brain - Feb 22, 2012
- Mobile phone users face 'brain cancer pandemic' - Jun 15, 2010
- Kids who use cell phones '5 times more likely to develop brain tumour' - Feb 01, 2011
- Folic acid reduces some childhood cancers - May 21, 2012
- Cellphones don't cause brain cancer - Dec 04, 2009
- Cancer warning on cell phones? - Apr 22, 2010
- New risk factors for brain metastases in breast cancer patients identified - Dec 10, 2010
- Oz scientists' defective gene discovery solves colorectal cancer mystery - Jan 17, 2011
Tags: 2000s, american cancer, assistant professor, brain cancer, brain cancers, cancer specialist, carcinogen, causal agent, columbia university, dramatic increase, frontal lobe, large numbers, magical formula, mathematical equation, national public radio, natural experiment, pulitzer prize, pulitzer winner, siddhartha, tumours