Why circumcision cuts HIV risk
November 24th, 2009 - 11:58 am ICT by ANI ( 1 comment )Washington, Nov 24 (ANI): Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection in men, but this link cannot be explained by a reduction in sores from conditions such as herpes, according to a new research.
Two clinical trials including more than 5,000 men in rural Uganda had shown that circumcision reduced the risk of HIV infection in men by about 60 percent.
In further analyses of this data Ron Gray of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and colleagues investigated factors associated with that reduction in risk.The specifically investigated whether infection with HSV-2, the virus that causes genital herpes, and whether genital ulcers of any cause, could account for the lower rates of HIV infection in the circumcised study participants.
The researchers found that reduction in symptomatic genital ulcer disease accounted for only about 10 percent of the protective effect associated with circumcision, and did not find any consistent role for HSV-2 in counteracting protection.
The results indicate that most of the reduction in HIV acquisition provided by male circumcision may be explained by the removal of vulnerable foreskin tissue containing HIV target cells.
They also suggest that circumcision reduces genital ulcer disease primarily by reducing the rate of ulceration due to causes other than herpes, including sores caused by mild trauma during intercourse.
The study has been published in PLoS Medicine. (ANI)
- Circumcision Lowers Chances Of HPV Risk In Women, Study Says - Jan 09, 2011
- Male circumcision 'cuts risk of common STDs, but not syphilis' - Mar 26, 2009
- Circumcision Lowers HPV Risk In Women, Says Survey - Jan 08, 2011
- Why circumcised men are less likely to get infected with HIV - Jan 06, 2010
- Herpes med does not cut HIV transmission risk - Jan 21, 2010
- Genital herpes vaccine ineffective in women: Study - Oct 01, 2010
- Why even treated genital herpes sores boost the risk of HIV infection - Aug 03, 2009
- Herpes drug does not cut HIV transmission risk - May 09, 2009
- Huge circumcision programme gets under way in Southern Africa - Jul 22, 2010
- Circumcision in boys could cut HIV risk, say experts - Sep 20, 2010
- Study associates herpes to Alzheimer's disease - Apr 05, 2011
- Study: Circumcision lowers HPV risk for women - Jan 10, 2011
- Just four out of ten patients know they have genital herpes - Apr 12, 2011
- Herpes vaccine edges closer to reality - Jun 16, 2010
- Condoms use linked to reduced risk of contracting herpes simplex virus 2 - Jul 14, 2009
Tags: bloomberg school of public health, clinical trials, consistent role, genital herpes, genital ulcer disease, genital ulcers, herpes, hiv acquisition, hiv infection, hiv risk, hsv 2, intercourse, johns hopkins bloomberg school of public health, male circumcision, rates of hiv, risk of hiv, ron gray, school of public health, study participants, target cells
December 16th, 2009 at 1:18 am
there are 3 Billion people in the globe who are Religiously circumcised. The prevalence of HIV/AIDS in them has not been less than the non. Then why is such a big fuss made over a small study in Uganda ? Even now the correct explanation is not given.Enlighten me if you know?=the cost and effort of mass circumcision is enormous. it is not at all practical even if you support it.