Wet ethanol production process yields more ethanol and more co-products
November 10th, 2009 - 1:56 pm ICT by ANIWashington, November 10 (ANI): A new study has indicated that a wet ethanol production method that begins by soaking corn kernels rather than grinding them, results in more gallons of ethanol and more usable co-products, giving ethanol producers a bigger bang for their buck - by about 20 percent.
“The conventional ethanol production method has fewer steps, but other than distillers dried grains with soluble, it doesn’t have any other co-products,” said University of Illinois Agricultural Engineer Esha Khullar.
“Whereas in both wet and dry fractionation processes, the result is ethanol, distillers dried grains with soluble, as well as germ and fiber. Corn fiber oil for example can be extracted from the fiber and used as heart-healthy additives in buttery spreads that can lower cholesterol,” she added.
In comparing the wet and dry fractionation methods, Khullar’s research team found that when using the wet fractionation method, the result is even higher ethanol concentrations coming out of the fermenter and better quality co-products than the dry method.
In the wet process, the corn kernels are soaked, washing the germ, which Khullar says is a cleaner separation.
“There’s not a lot of starch sticking to the germ. That’s why you get higher oil concentrations,” she said.
After the kernels are soaked, they are ground to produce a slurry.
The slurry is soaked with enzymes so that it raises the specific gravity to a point where the germ starts floating and can be fished out from the top.
Khullar explained that in the dry fractionation method, the kernel is crushed, flattening out the germ.
“The germ is still attached to a certain part of the endosperm and you still have a few starch pieces sticking to it. You have a very high starch content germ from the dry fractionation and that lowers the oil content. That’s why there’s a big difference in the wet process versus the dry process,” she said.
Dry and wet fractionation methods have been developed to separate out the germ and pericarp fiber before fermentation which is more efficient because the germ and fiber are non-fermentable.
“It’s better to removed them before the process. That way you have more starch in the fermenter. And you don’t have to heat them and bump them and cool them,” Khullar said. (ANI)
- How to give chapathi a big boost of protein and fiber - Jun 05, 2010
- New method uses electrolyzed water for more efficient fuel production - Jul 28, 2009
- How to enhance nutrient content in chapathies, by Indian-origin scientist - Dec 27, 2009
- Fungus improves dry-grind ethanol production process - May 28, 2008
- Starch fibres could make for 'painless' bandages - May 03, 2012
- New yeast strain 'cuts major drawbacks of biofuel production methods' - Dec 28, 2010
- Eat wheat flour and almonds to 'satisfy hunger pains' - Apr 24, 2011
- Dr Oz: For Those Turning 40 - Oct 18, 2011
- Now, cheap, efficient method to convert algae into renewable fuel - Mar 06, 2011
- Orange peels and newspapers may lead to cheaper and cleaner fuel - Feb 19, 2010
- Popcorn was discovered in ancient coastal Peru - Jan 19, 2012
- Cox gives advice to deal with dry skin - Jul 29, 2011
- Cutting fat, calories 'can reduce cancer risk in dogs and humans' - Jul 24, 2010
- Here's what an Iron Age beer tastes like - Jan 16, 2011
- New enzymes for cheaper biofuel production engineered - Mar 24, 2009
Tags: additives, agricultural engineer, corn fiber, corn kernels, distillers, endosperm, enzymes, ethanol concentrations, ethanol producers, ethanol production process, fermenter, fractionation, germ, grains, oil concentrations, oil content, slurry, specific gravity, starch content, wet process