‘Sophisticated’ cavemen ‘had more in common with us than we like to think’
March 26th, 2011 - 1:41 pm ICT by ANILondon, Mar 26 (ANI): A leading archaeologist claims that cavemen were far more sophisticated than their dimwitted reputation suggests.
Professor John J Shea, of Stony Brook University, New York, says evidence of early humans’ weapons, symbols and burials 195,000 years ago shows they had more in common with us than we like to think.
He claims Homo sapiens emerged all at once, ‘not as modern-looking people first and as a modern-behaving people later.’
Professor Shea started researching ‘behavioral variability’ in 2002 after excavating a 195,000-year-old site in Ethiopia.
“Nothing about the stone tools … struck me as archaic or primitive,” the Daily Mail quoted him as saying in his article, Refuting a Myth About Human Origins.
“We need to discard an incorrect and outdated idea about human evolution, the belief that prehistoric Homo sapiens can be divided into “archaic” and “modern” humans.”
It follows research suggesting that a caveman did not only rely on animals for their diet but also dined on processed plant-based foods.
Powerful microscopes discovered traces of starch grains on grinding stones recovered from archaeological sites in Italy, Russia and the Czech Republic.
It has also been claimed that cavemen were better parents than we are.
Today’s practice of leaving babies to cry, keeping them in buggies and car seats for long periods would be anathema to early humans.
Their children were cuddled and carried about, never left to cry, spent lots of time outdoors and were breastfed for years rather than months.
And the fact cavemen had to rely on their wits should prove they were not thick, Professor Shea claims.
He explained: “In the unforgiving Pleistocene environments in which our species evolved, reproductive isolation was the penalty for stupidity, and lions and wolves were its cure.
“In other words: No villages, no village idiots. If any such cognitive “winner take all” wipeout event ever happened, it was probably among earlier hominins or during the evolutionary differentiation of our species from these hominin ancestors.”
The study has been published by American Scientist magazine. (ANI)
- New study suggests earliest humans were not very different from us - Feb 15, 2011
- Modern humans not uniquely evolved species - Sep 06, 2011
- Humans survived ice age by sheltering in 'Garden of Eden' - Jul 27, 2010
- Did first humans emerge from Middle East, not Africa? - Dec 28, 2010
- 400,000-yr-old remains show 'humans evolved from Middle East, not Africa' - Dec 28, 2010
- Neanderthals, modern humans 'are more brothers than distant cousins' - Sep 26, 2010
- Deadly combo of bad luck and climate change may have killed Neanderthals - Nov 09, 2009
- Neanderthals developed technology on their own - Sep 22, 2010
- 2 mln yr old skulls rewrite history of humankind - Sep 09, 2009
- World's first known cannibals ate each other for extra nutrition - Aug 27, 2010
- Last few early humans survived in 'Eden' during ice age - Jul 26, 2010
- Ancient teeth found in Israeli cave raise questions about humans' origin - Feb 10, 2011
- 'Hobbit' was 'iodine-deficient human, not another species' - Sep 29, 2010
- The "hobbit" evolved separate to humans - Jul 31, 2009
- Aquatic diet of early humans behind evolution of brain - Jun 02, 2010
Tags: anathema, archaeological sites, burials, car seats, caveman, cavemen, daily mail, early humans, grinding stones, human evolution, human origins, long periods, microscopes, professor john, reproductive isolation, starch grains, stone tools, stony brook university, village idiots, wipeout