Simplified tool to estimate heart risk may miscalculate
September 10th, 2010 - 3:29 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Sep 10 (ANI): A new study has questioned the efficiency of a method that is being widely used to predict risk of major heart problems as it is likely to over or underestimate the risk for millions of Americans.
The method in question is the simplified version of the so-called Framingham model, which is used to estimate a patient’s 10-year risk of a heart attack, stroke, or other coronary event based on risk factors such as age, cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and smoking.
National guidelines recommend using the risk estimates generated by the Framingham model to classify patients as among one of three risk groups.
Researchers at the San Francisco VA Medical Center and the University of California assessed data from 2,543 subjects who participated from 2001 to 2006 in National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
For each subject, the researchers calculated risk based on the original Framingham model and on the simplified model, and compared the differences, “which turned out to be substantial for many patients,” said Michael Steinman, senior author of the paper.
Under the point-based system, 15 percent of the subjects were classified as being at a different level of risk than they were under the original model.
Nationwide, said the authors, 5.7 million Americans would be placed into different risk groups using the point-based model than they would be using the original model, with 3.9 million misclassified into higher risk groups and 1.8 million misclassified into lower risk groups.
“Across the group, on average, these statistical differences balance out. But for individual patients, they are potentially important. A lot of individuals would be treated differently - either more aggressively or less aggressively - using the point-based model.
“While the point-based system is a substantial improvement over having no standardized method for predicting risk, just about any computer or PDA in use today can calculate the original Framingham model.
“This means that your doctor can calculate your risk just as easily using the complex equation, which is likely to be more accurate than the point-based system. So there’s not much reason to use the point-based system anymore in most instances,” said Steinman.
The study appeared in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. (ANI)
- Obese patients at higher risk from major complications after surgery - Apr 19, 2011
- Coronary artery calcium may help predict heart disease risk - Apr 28, 2010
- Deceased Steinmen to remain Nobel Laureate: Nobel foundation - Oct 04, 2011
- Now, simple blood test to help predict chronic kidney disease - Oct 22, 2010
- Brain scans may help predict which adults will develop Alzheimer's - Apr 07, 2011
- Nobel medicine laureate Steinman dead: Rockefeller University - Oct 03, 2011
- Ethnicity key to accurate obesity measurements - Apr 22, 2010
- Cuba develops mathematical models to fight dengue - Mar 24, 2012
- More accurate tests needed to predict cardiovascular problems in the elderly: Study - Jan 09, 2009
- Blood identifies people with heart attack risk - Apr 20, 2010
- Indian education needs more flexibility: Indian American mathematician - Jan 22, 2012
- 3 gene mutations hold the key to suicidal behaviour - Jun 16, 2010
- NASA successfully demonstrates prototype tsunami prediction system - Jun 15, 2010
- Smoking can kill 40 mn more people - Oct 05, 2011
- Affordable Indian drugs could cut sclerosis treatment cost - Nov 13, 2011
Tags: blood pressure, centers for disease control, centers for disease control and prevention, cholesterol levels, coronary event, disease control and prevention, framingham, francisco va medical center, health and nutrition, heart attack, heart problems, heart risk, michael steinman, national health, nutrition examination surveys, original model, risk factors, risk groups, statistical differences, substantial improvement