Scientists call new gulf spill report ‘ludicrous’August 6th, 2010 - 2:07 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Aug 6 (ANI): Scientists have labelled the new U.S. government report that claims it has taken care of the gulf oil spill as ‘ludicrous’.
Experts are also warning that majority of the oil is trapped under Gulf beaches and could remain there for years.
A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) report has claimed 33 percent oil has been burned, skimmed, dispersed, or directly recovered by cleanup operations.
Another 25 percent has evaporated into the atmosphere or dissolved in the ocean, and 16 percent has been dispersed via natural break-up of the oil into microscopic droplets.
The remaining 26 percent, the report says, is still either on or just below the surface, has washed ashore or been collected from shores, or is buried along the coasts.
But scientists argue that fluid nature of the ocean means that it’s “exceedingly hard” to track oil.
According to National Geographic News, to University of South Florida chemical oceanographer David Hollander, the NOAA estimates are “ludicrous.”
“It’s almost comical,” he said.
Hollander said that while 25 percent can be accounted for (by burning, skimming etc), 75 percent is still unaccounted for.
For instance, the report considers all submerged oil to be dispersed and therefore not harmful, but that’s not the case.
This week, biological oceanographer Markus Huettel and colleague Joel Kostka dug trenches on a cleaned Pensacola beach and discovered large swaths of oil up to two feet deep.
And ‘oil-breaking’ by microbes depends on how much oxygen is available for the tiny organisms.
Microbes are not an oil-cleanup panacea either, cautioned LSU’s Carney.
“The sentimentality that bacteria turn everything into fish food and CO2 is total bull,” he said.
Plus, they selectively break oil, and take ages to do it.
Then remains the question of oil in deep oceans. The mixture of oil and chemical dispersants may be suspended and preserved, causing long-term problems for deep-sea animals, said Texas Tech University ecotoxicologist Ron Kendall.
“We’re getting into something different than the 2-D petroleum spill” on the Gulf’s surface, said Hollander.
“All of the sudden you’ve taken this 2-D disaster and turned it into a 3-D catastrophe,” he added. (ANI)
- '74 percent of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has been effectively dealt with' - Aug 04, 2010
- Massive deep-sea coral die-off discovered near Gulf of Mexico - Nov 06, 2010
- Massive amounts of oil at bottom of Gulf of Mexico: Report - Sep 15, 2010
- Bugs ate 200,000 tonnes of oil spill: Study - Sep 12, 2012
- New clean-up tools being used to protect wetlands from Gulf of Mexico oil spill - May 21, 2010
- Gulf Tragedy: Oil May Reach Loop Current Within 24 Hours - May 04, 2010
- US oil spill could reach Louisiana shore by Friday - Apr 29, 2010
- U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency and Coast Guard to hold news conference on next steps to combat oil spill - May 25, 2010
- President Obama to tour oil spill disaster area - May 02, 2010
- Gulf spill study shows long-term toxic effect of dispersants - Jan 27, 2011
- RAW -- Update on Administration-wide response efforts in the Gulf Coast - May 02, 2010
- Oil munching bacteria not breaking down giant underwater oil-plume - Aug 20, 2010
- US Coast Guard under fire for chemicals used against BP gusher - Aug 02, 2010
- Baldwin forms cleanup crew to aid oil spill victims - Aug 29, 2010
- The most FAQs about microbes and oil spills - Feb 18, 2011
Tags: biological oceanographer, chemical dispersants, chemical oceanographer, cleanup operations, david hollander, deep oceans, florida chemical, fluid nature, government report, gulf beaches, gulf oil, kostka, national geographic news, national oceanic and atmospheric administration, oil cleanup, oil spill, pensacola beach, sentimentality, tiny organisms, university of south florida