Robot helping boffins to determine how we decide to trust strangersJuly 11th, 2010 - 1:50 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, July 11 (ANI): American researchers are using a robot to find out how humans decide to trust strangers and if those decisions are accurate.
Northeastern University psychology professor David DeSteno is collaborating with Cynthia Breazeal, director of the MIT Media Lab’s Personal Robots Group, Robert Frank, an economist, and David Pizarro, a psychologist, both from Cornell, for the interdisciplinary research.
The team is examining whether nonverbal cues and gestures could affect our trustworthiness judgments.
DeSteno said: “People tend to mimic each other’s body language which might help them develop intuitions about what other people are feeling - intuitions about whether they’ll treat them fairly.”
This project tests their theories by having humans interact with the social robot, Nexi, in an attempt to judge her trustworthiness. Unbeknownst to participants, Nexi has been programmed to make gestures while speaking with selected participants - gestures that the team hypothesizes could determine whether or not she’s deemed trustworthy.
DeSteno said: “Using a humanoid robot whose every expression and gesture we can control will allow us to better identify the exact cues and psychological processes that underlie humans’ ability to accurately predict if a stranger is trustworthy.”
During the first part of the experiment, Nexi makes small talk with her human counterpart for 10 minutes, asking and answering questions about topics such as travelling, where they are from and what they like most about living in Boston.
DeSteno said: “The goal was to simulate a normal conversation with accompanying movements to see what the mind would intuitively glean about the trustworthiness of another,”
The participants then play an economic game called “Give Some,” which asks them to determine how much money Nexi might give them at the expense of her individual profit. Simultaneously, they decide how much, if any, they’ll give to Nexi. The rules of the game allow for two distinct outcomes: higher individual profit for one and loss for the other, or relatively smaller and equal profits for both partners.
DeSteno said: “Trust might not be determined by one isolated gesture, but rather a ‘dance’ that happens between the strangers, which leads them to trust or not trust the other.”
The team will continue testing their theories by seeing if Nexi can be taught to predict the trustworthiness of human partners. (ANI)
- Non-verbal cues predict one's trustworthiness - Sep 12, 2012
- Happy people are not always trusting people - Mar 03, 2010
- Good mood can also make you less trusting - Mar 08, 2010
- 'Looks may decide whether to trust a person' - May 16, 2012
- Our gut feelings can cut both ways - good or bad - Jan 05, 2011
- Gratitude shapes decisions towards social good - Sep 20, 2009
- Why we must follow gut instinct, but not always - Jan 05, 2011
- Table tennis playing robots debut in China - Oct 11, 2011
- Can robots be blamed for killing civilians? - Apr 24, 2012
- Newton was right: We better judge falling objects when upright than prone - Apr 28, 2011
- Making human-like robots for easier interaction with people - Mar 08, 2011
- Scientists develop robotic legs that mimic human gait - Jul 06, 2012
- Women base their body image more on others' opinion - Mar 30, 2011
- Reliance on the supernatural grows with age - Aug 31, 2012
- Stethoscope helps doctors win patients' trust - Aug 13, 2012
Tags: american researchers, answering questions, cynthia breazeal, david pizarro, economic game, human counterpart, humanoid robot, interdisciplinary research, intuitions, nexi, nonverbal cues, northeastern university, personal robots, professor david, project tests, psychological processes, psychology professor, robots group, social robot, university psychology