Reducing natural water flow rates may bring ecological benefits
January 5th, 2010 - 5:29 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )Washington, January 5 (ANI): A new study by scientists has suggested that in some highly disturbed landscapes, restoration of natural water flows may cause more harm than good, which suggests that reducing the flows can create ecological benefits.
The study was done by C. Rhett Jackson and Catherine M. Pringle of the University of Georgia, US.
The scientists analyzed a wide variety of examples in which creating or maintaining reduced flows can create ecological benefits.
The presence of nonnative fishes in a river, for example, can argue for maintaining the isolation of some habitats that are separated from the main channel, because the nonnative species may imperil naturally occurring species.
In other cases, novel vegetation that has grown up below a dam may be host to terrestrial animal populations, including endangered birds.
Restoring natural water flows can lead to a change in the vegetation that is detrimental to the animals.
Awareness of the potential benefits of maintaining low “hydrologic connectivity” has extended to the creation of artificial barriers to protect species at risk.
The endangered native greenback cutthroat trout, for example, is protected from nonnative brook trout moving upstream by the placement of small dams in stream headwaters in the Colorado River basin.
Expensive attempts are also being made to deter exotic nuisance species such as bighead carp and silver carp from invading Lake Michigan via the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
Experts disagree on whether the multimillion-dollar electric dispersal barriers now being constructed on the canal will succeed, and some authorities have argued that only permanently disconnecting the canal will protect Lake Michigan.
Many urban streams represent particular challenges when attempts are made to restore natural flows. Expensive restoration efforts in streams in Seattle, for example, led to high pre-spawning mortality of salmon, possibly because they were exposed to copper pollution.
Maintaining low flows can also mitigate the effects of pollution on ecosystems when ponds and lakes sequester sediments and nutrients that would otherwise be more widely dispersed. (ANI)
- Asian carp crisis in Michigan now in the hands of President Obama - Apr 26, 2010
- Kashmir's trouts in troubled waters - Apr 16, 2011
- Asian Carp Feared To Damage Eco-System Of Great Lake - Nov 21, 2009
- China's aquatic diversity in danger: Experts - Apr 06, 2011
- Moving species could save them, says expert - Mar 18, 2011
- Himachal trout goes to Delhi - for Games! - Sep 22, 2010
- Climate change adversely impacts populations of trout, salmon - May 18, 2010
- Floods affect Himachal's trout breeding - Sep 05, 2011
- Reforestation may lower climate change mitigation potential of forests - May 29, 2010
- San Francisco, CA man pleads guilty to violating Endangered Species Act - Jan 27, 2010
- Invasive plants can be good for eco-change - Feb 13, 2011
- Algal turf can clean highly polluted streams, lakes - Jun 01, 2011
- Increasing pollution levels choking India's lakes - Sep 29, 2011
- Farming vital for endangered species - Dec 05, 2011
- Poor marketing hinders trout farming - Dec 20, 2011
Tags: animal populations, artificial barriers, brook trout, chicago sanitary and ship canal, colorado river basin, dispersal, ecological benefits, endangered birds, greenback cutthroat trout, headwaters, multimillion dollar, natural flows, natural water flows, nonnative species, nuisance species, restoration efforts, species at risk, terrestrial animal, urban streams, water flow rates