Pregnant women face hostility when applying for jobs
May 7th, 2008 - 5:04 pm ICT by admin ( Leave a comment )Washington, May 7 (ANI): When it comes to getting jobs, pregnant women still face judgment and obstacles, show two recent studies by George Mason University and Rice University professors.
The studies, co-written by Eden King of Mason, Michelle Hebl of Rice and their collaborators, explored different interpersonal reactions that pregnant women face in their daily lives.
In one study, 81 adults evaluated a pregnant or non-pregnant applicant for male- or female-typed jobs.
Those who provided evaluations for more traditionally masculine jobs such as corporate lawyer, janitor, high school math teacher or general surgeon were more judgmental toward the pregnant woman (for example, agreed more with the statements that the applicant would complain a lot or would expect to have their work done for them) than when evaluating the same applicant for positions such as a maid, kindergarten teacher or pediatrician.
In another study, research assistants entered 110 retail stores and followed a script in which they either applied for a job or browsed for a gift, sometimes wearing a prosthesis that made them appear pregnant.
The research assistants, and a secret observer, rated salespersons hostile behaviors, example rude, anxious, short, and patronizing behaviors, example diminutive names, overfriendliness, touching.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 prohibits formal discrimination against pregnant women in all federal jobs and in companies with 15 or more employees, says King, assistant professor of psychology.
Unfortunately, when people suppress their discrimination in one arena, it may emerge in anothersubtle interpersonal cues such as avoidance of eye contact or lack of warmth, King added.
The study found that the women who asked about job opportunities when wearing the pregnancy prosthesis were faced with significantly more interpersonal hostility than when the same women appeared as non-pregnant and inquired about jobs.
In contrast, the study also showed that pregnant women who stayed within more traditional boundsshoppingexperienced overtly patronizing behavior.
King and Hebls results showed that pregnant women who went into retail stores asking for help finding a gift more often found themselves victims of behavior such as overfriendliness, physical touching and being called honey or sweetie.
The question we also have to ask is: Does being overly nice have negative consequences? And weve seen that it does. These reactions serve to maintain traditional gender roles, which can inhibit womens success both in and outside of the workplace, King says.
The results of both studies suggest that pregnant women who pursue jobsespecially traditionally masculine jobsmay not be formally turned down, but still risk being discriminated against.
The study is published in the Journal of Applied Psychology. (ANI)
- Pregnant women face hostile reception - May 07, 2008
- Scars, birthmarks stigmatise job seekers - Nov 11, 2011
- Beauty can be burden in man's world - Aug 09, 2010
- Being beautiful doesn't always pay off - Aug 07, 2010
- Male modesty a turn off for both men and women - Jul 30, 2010
- Attractive women also face workplace discrimination - Aug 08, 2010
- Women really do prefer macho men - Jul 31, 2010
- Some pills more likely to cause blood clots - Oct 26, 2011
- Males act hostile when asked to do dishes - May 04, 2011
- Women treated for breast cancer while pregnant have improved survival - Sep 30, 2010
- 'Macho-looking' men more attractive to fertile women - Jan 11, 2011
- Bashful men are less liked - Jul 30, 2010
- German masculine language forms express distance and distaste - Oct 05, 2010
- Women find deep, low male voice appealing - Sep 13, 2011
- 'Macho' men take more risks on the road - May 27, 2010
Tags: avoidance, corporate lawyer, eye contact, federal jobs, george mason university, high school math, hostile behaviors, hostility, janitor, kindergarten teacher, pediatrician, pregnancy discrimination act, pregnancy discrimination act of 1978, pregnant woman, pregnant women, prosthesis, rice university, school math teacher, university professors, women face