Possible discovery of new sub-atomic particle could upset rules of physics
April 18th, 2011 - 5:48 pm ICT by ANILondon, Apr 18 (ANI): The possible discovery of a new sub-atomic particle has left physicists in a tizzy, as it could upset the universal rules of physics established for more than 30 years.
Earlier this month there was an “intriguing bump” in the data collected from high-speed collisions of sub-atomic particles at the US Fermilab’s particle collider near Chicago, which smashes protons and anti-protons together two million times a second.
Scientists thought they could detect energy emissions from what would have to be a new sub-atomic particle, or even a whole “zoo” of particles, existing for a fraction of a second before turning into something more familiar.
The researchers believe the anomaly in their data indicated that the hitherto undiscovered sub-atomic particle has a mass of about 150 times that of a proton, the positively-charged entity within an atom’s nucleus.
If this proves to be the case, it could spell the end of the idea that matter has a mass because of the existence of another kind of sub-atomic particle called the Higgs boson, the so-called “God particle” predicted by theoretical physicists but yet to be found.
“If this signal is what we think it is, we could be on the verge of understanding why matter has mass, whereas light doesn’t,” the Independent quoted Professor Kenneth Lane, a theoretical physicist at Boston University, as saying.
“We might be seeing the signal for a new kind of nuclear interaction which we have called ‘technicolour’. This scenario basically replaces the Higgs boson,” he said.
The Standard Model of physics, which explains how sub-atomic particles interact with the four known forces of nature - gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces - predicts that the Higgs boson, if it exists, could also explain why things have a weight to them.
Professor Brian Cox of Manchester University said that if the results hold up to further analysis, and confirmation by a second experiment, “then it is RIP Standard Model”.
However, even though the physicists at the Tevatron particle collider are 99.7 percent sure of their data, this does not yet qualify as a discovery. For that, they need the probability to be better than one in a million. (ANI)
- Indian scientists dismiss reports on 'god particle' - May 01, 2011
- Boffins inch closer to discovering elusive "God particle" - Jul 27, 2010
- American research suggests existence of 'multiple God particles' - Jun 15, 2010
- Has the 'Big Bang' machine detected the elusive 'God particle'? - Apr 23, 2011
- Large Hadron Collider sets new beam intensity record - Apr 23, 2011
- US 'atom smasher' could get more time to hunt 'God particle' - Jul 23, 2010
- 'God particle' mystery to be solved by 2012 - May 18, 2011
- Can Hadron Collider be world's first time machine? - Mar 17, 2011
- Could Large Hadron Collider be world's first time machine? - Mar 16, 2011
- LHC to soon search for new sub-atomic particles, says physicist - May 18, 2010
- Higgs discovery rumour baseless - Jul 14, 2010
- Scientists trash reports of God particle discovery - Jul 16, 2010
- Scientists simulate 'God particle's' expected sound - Jun 23, 2010
- God Particle hidden at lower mass, say physicists - Mar 14, 2009
- God particle may not exist after all, say experts - Aug 23, 2011
Tags: boston university, brian cox, electromagnetism, energy emissions, fermilab, god particle, higgs boson, manchester university, model of physics, nuclear forces, nuclear interaction, particle collider, professor brian, professor kenneth, speed collisions, sub atomic particles, theoretical physicist, theoretical physicists, turning into something, universal rules