Planting forests where none existed may reduce local availability of water
November 9th, 2009 - 1:40 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )London, November 9 (ANI): Two new studies have determined that planting forests in areas that currently don’t have trees can reduce the local availability of water, by shifting water flow.
One key measure of water flow is ‘base flow’, the proportion of a stream or river not attributable to direct run-off from precipitation or melting snow.
Base flow is often seen as the minimum supply of water on which people can safely rely.
But, in basins that contain small rivers, afforestation can reduce base flow by up to 50 percent, Esteban Jobbagy, an ecologist at Argentina’s national scientific council (CONICET) and the National University of San Luis, told Nature News.
Less base flow means less water for local populations.
“It’s a concern especially in drier regions, where the differences in base flow may be more noticeable,” said Dan Binkley, a forest ecologist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins who was not involved in the research.
Jobbagy’s team conducted a two-year study on seven paired basins - seven with native grasslands and seven that had been planted with forests - in the province of Cordoba, Argentina.
With their deep roots and tall canopies, trees absorb and transpire more water than do grasses, resulting in drier streams.
According to Jobbagy, reductions in base flow are less pronounced in sloping or rocky basins, as water can escape from the tree roots and travel through the rocks.
A second study presented at the conference, and conducted in Uruguay, came to similar conclusions.
A team led by Wayne Skaggs of North Carolina State University in Chapel Hill, in collaboration with the US Forest Service, afforested one of a pair of watersheds.
The researchers observed an 18-22 percent drop in base flow in the afforested watershed compared with the watershed that had been left as grassland.
“As the trees get larger, the effect will be somewhat greater,” said Skaggs.
Besides reducing base flow, afforestation can affect how water filters through the ecosystem. “Afforested sites are not as ’splashy’ as pastured sites,” said Skaggs.
Jobbagy said that, at least for his study areas, the ideal balance between afforestation and water needs is for one-quarter of the river basin to be planted with between 400 and 500 trees per hectare.
“It is possible to prevent drastic effects” on water availability,” he said.
Also, choosing tree species wisely might help, Binkley and Jobbagy suggest, as different species use water at different rates. (ANI)
- New grasslands to boost Bihar tigers (With Images) - Jan 08, 2012
- World Bank to finance Uttarakhand hydro-power project - Aug 12, 2011
- Controlling urban growth, increasing forested land may prevent floods - Aug 20, 2010
- NASA satellite improves pollution monitoring - Jul 26, 2010
- India named global host of World Environment Day 2011 - Feb 23, 2011
- China spends $158 mn on nature reserve - Jan 23, 2012
- China spends $158m on major riverheads - Jan 23, 2012
- Huge parts of world drying up due to land 'evapotranspiration': Study - Oct 11, 2010
- Depleting forests in Himachal worry green activists (April 22 is Earth Day) - Apr 22, 2011
- Reforestation may lower climate change mitigation potential of forests - May 29, 2010
- Mamata's tryst with nature - Jul 19, 2011
- Spiritual guru favours carbon tax - Dec 22, 2011
- New model to measure organic carbon in surface waters - Mar 05, 2011
- Nature and humans destroying aquatic food webs - Oct 16, 2010
- Amazon's loss of "flying rivers" making it lose ability to curb global warming - Dec 20, 2009
Tags: base flow, basins, colorado state university, conicet, cordoba argentina, dan binkley, deep roots, forest ecologist, grassland, melting snow, native grasslands, nature news, north carolina state university, roots and travel, skaggs, snow base, tree roots, us forest service, water flow, watersheds