Patchy monitoring may have made swine flu go undetected in pigsJune 17th, 2009 - 2:03 pm ICT by ANI
London, June 17 (ANI): Public-health experts have warned that a lack of surveillance may be allowing the 2009 pandemic H1N1 flu virus, dubbed ’swine flu’, to go undetected in pigs, which raises the risk that the virus could circulate freely between humans and pigs, making it more likely to develop into a deadlier strain.
Pig surveillance is largely the remit of animal-health organizations, agriculture ministries and the farming industry.
Their main concern tends to be that any reports of the pandemic virus in pigs might provoke overreactions such as the mass culling of pigs that took place in Egypt, or trade bans on pigs and pork.
According to a report in Nature News, some experts say that the H1N1 flu virus is an artifact of patchy to non-existent flu surveillance in pigs.
Gavin Smith, a flu geneticist at the University of Hong Kong, and his colleagues concluded that “the lack of systematic swine surveillance allowed for the undetected persistence and evolution of this potentially pandemic strain for many years”.
“The virus originated from a mixture of swine flu strains, and pigs are an “obvious” part of the epidemiology of the new virus,” said Smith.
Yet, the number of swine-flu sequences in the international GenBank database is about a tenth of that for avian flu viruses.
Circulation of the virus between pigs and humans is “definitely a possibility,” said Smith.
The pandemic virus has so far been found in pigs from just one farm, in Alberta, Canada, where it spread throughout the herd.
But, no one has been able to pin down how the herd became infected.
Scientists at the Veterinary Laboratories Agency in Weybridge, UK, have shown that pigs can easily become infected with the virus, and readily transmit it between themselves and shed it into the environment.
Past pandemic viruses have also gone on to become endemic in pig populations.
“It’s absolutely surprising that a virus this contagious in both humans and swine, and which has been reported in humans in 76 countries, has only been reported in one swine farm in Canada,” said Jimmy Smith, head of livestock affairs at the World Bank in Washington DC, and a member of the organization’s flu task force.
“It is highly likely that more pigs are infected in more places,” he added.
“Surveillance for swine flu is not something that has been high on the agenda of government services,” said Steve Edwards, chairman of the OIE-FAO Network of Expertise on Animal Influenza (OFFLU). “It is seen as a farming-industry problem,” he added. (ANI)
- Canada reports first case of pigs catching swine flu from humans - May 03, 2009
- Avian flu virus wiping out baby seals - Aug 01, 2012
- La Nina may trigger flu pandemics: Study - Jan 17, 2012
- CDC confirms three new swine flu cases in Iowa - Nov 25, 2011
- Human, bird flu virus interaction can create more virulent strains - Feb 23, 2010
- Deadly flu viruses lurk in humans, animals for years before pandemic outbreaks - Jul 15, 2009
- '2009 swine flu pandemic won't return to Maharashtra' - Apr 04, 2012
- Swine flu rising in Russia, Europe - Jan 17, 2011
- Flu transmitted before symptoms appear, says study - Aug 30, 2012
- Pandemic flu virus may become resistant to Tamiflu - Mar 02, 2010
- Effective antibodies against flu strains identified - Aug 10, 2012
- Key Facts about Swine Influenza (Swine Flu) - Apr 26, 2009
- Now, humans can give swine flu to pigs - Jul 10, 2009
- SMART biochip can speedily detect flu virus - Jun 11, 2012
- Swine flu may become resistant to Tamiflu - Mar 02, 2010
Tags: alberta canada, avian flu, culling, endemic, farming industry, flu strains, flu virus, flu viruses, gavin smith, genbank database, geneticist, health organizations, nature news, new virus, pandemic, public health experts, swine flu, trade bans, veterinary laboratories agency, weybridge uk