Not all Neanderthals snacked on one another

April 4th, 2009 - 2:37 pm ICT by ANI  

Washington, April 4 (ANI): A new study has suggested that Neanderthal remains from the site of Krapina in northern Croatia do not exhibit evidence of cannibalism, as was earlier believed.

The fragmentary nature of the bones, along with cut marks on a number of fragments, were said to be signs that our closest relatives feasted on one another.

But, according to a report in the Scientific American, a new study suggests that the nicks seem to be the result of much more recent handiwork.

Paleoanthropologist and archaeologist Jorg Orschiedt of the University of Hamburg in Germany said that cut marks in the Krapina fossils he studied are randomly distributed and did not necessarily occur in spots that would permit de-fleshing (such as where muscles attach to bones).

What’s more, the scratches varied - some were shallow and others deep.

An alternative explanation to cannibalism dawned on him as he sifted through photos of the bones.

Specifically, he came across a picture of a bone fragment with the letter F for femur (the thighbone) scrawled on it.

It turns out the bone was mislabeled. It was actually part of a shinbone, not a thighbone, but what caught Orschiedt’s eye was that the cut marks interrupted the F.

He concluded that the scratches were likely made inadvertently by a researcher-possibly during measurement of the bone with sharp instruments-after the bone was labeled, probably in the early 1900s.

One Krapina specimen that Orschiedt believes does have genuinely ancient cut marks is a famous partial skull known as the C skull.

These nicks, which appear in the center of the forehead, are encrusted with minerals that could only have accumulated long ago.

“It’s tempting to say it has to do with burial customs,” Orschiedt said, although it is impossible to know the exact nature of those practices.

As for the fact that many of the Krapina Neandertal bones are broken to bits, which investigators have long attributed to the hominids extracting nutritious marrow, Orschiedt believes that hungry carnivores were responsible for much of the damage.

He also thinks that as the roof of the rock shelter crumbled over time, falling rocks smashed the bones.

If Orschiedt is right, what is arguably the most famous example of cannibalism among our closest relatives can no longer be held up as such. (ANI)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Health Science |

Subscribe