No evidence of comet explosion over North America 13,000 years ago
October 13th, 2009 - 3:02 pm ICT by ANI ( 1 comment )London, October 13 (ANI): An independent study has cast more doubt on a controversial theory that a comet exploded over icy North America nearly 13,000 years ago, wiping out the Clovis people and many of the continent’s large animals.
In 2007, a team led by Californian researchers announced a theory that a comet or asteroid had exploded over the North American ice sheet, creating widespread fire and an atmospheric soot burst followed by a cooling period known as the Younger Dryas.
Sometime after this, the Clovis people, sophisticated large-animal hunters known for their spear points, mysteriously disappeared.
The team linked their vanishing to the environmental effects of the proposed impact.
Key evidence came in the form of magnetic microspherules discovered in sediments at 25 locations, including eight Clovis-age sites.
Richard Firestone, of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, and his colleagues argued that the microspherules were remnants of cosmic debris from an explosion.
But, according to a report in Nature News, in more than 18 months of sedimentary analysis, a team led by Todd Surovell, an archaeologist at the University of Wyoming in Laramie, was unable to detect microspherule peaks.
Two of the seven sites the group studied were places where Firestone’s team identified spherule peaks.
“I spent hundreds of hours at the microscope examining sediment samples and I didn’t find any physical evidence to support their theory,” said Surovell.
Several other groups have been unable to support important aspects of the comet theory.
Jennifer Marlon, a doctoral geography student at the University of Oregon in Eugene, and her colleagues found no systematic burning of biomass - as would have occurred if continent-wide fires had happened - at the time of the Younger Dryas in pollen and charcoal records at 35 sites.
Also, Jacquelyn Gill, a palaeoecology doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, reported finding no evidence of massive burning in sediment cores taken from lake beds in Ohio and Indiana. (ANI)
- New study challenges Clovis comet catastrophe theory - Sep 30, 2010
- Comets didn't wipe out early Americans 12,900 years ago - Oct 24, 2009
- Fossil evidence challenges Younger Dryas Impact theory - Jun 17, 2010
- Scientists disapprove American comet impact theory - Jan 28, 2009
- No evidence found for meteorite impact event 13,000 years ago - Dec 09, 2009
- Meteor-impact may not have killed mammoths, great bears, claim experts - Sep 01, 2010
- Comet-impact may not have killed mammoths, claim experts - Sep 06, 2010
- America holds 12,900 year old nanodiamond-rich soil - Jan 02, 2009
- Earliest American residents came at least 15,500 years ago - Mar 25, 2011
- Sophisticated hunters not to blame for driving mammoths to extinction - Nov 23, 2009
- 13,000 yr old Clovis-era tool cache shows evidence of camel, horse butchering - Feb 26, 2009
- Ancient nanodiamonds proof of Earths impact with comets 12,900 years ago - Jan 02, 2009
- Island tool finds offer insights into lives of first Americans - Mar 05, 2011
- Oldest American artefact unearthed dates back to 14,230 years - Nov 06, 2009
- Ancient 'space blast' over Antarctica similar to Tunguska event of 1908 - Mar 04, 2010
Tags: berkeley national laboratory, californian researchers, clovis people, comet explosion, comet theory, controversial theory, cosmic debris, geography student, jacquelyn, key evidence, lawrence berkeley national laboratory, nature news, physical evidence, sediment samples, sedimentary analysis, spear points, surovell, university of oregon, university of wyoming, younger dryas
November 24th, 2009 at 11:23 pm
I have learned much over the past two years.
I have learned that, in a 21st century twist on Cassandra’s curse, the likelihood that the observations of an amateur will be considered seriously by the academic community, is inversely proportionate to the significance of those observations.
I have also learned that there is no need to fear people stealing an original idea. Original ideas that change things must be stuffed down their throats.
And I have read in the literature that impact structures are difficult to find. I haven’t found that to be the case.
My question is this: How many craters does it take to make a mouth full?
http://sites.google.com/site/dragonstormproject/craters-in-new-mexico
With deepest regards,
Dennis Cox