New power plants might cannibalize energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants
March 5th, 2008 - 5:08 pm ICT by admin - Send to a friend:Washington, March 5 (ANI): A new report has determined that unless there is a major improvement in nuclear power efficiency, each new power plant will simply cannibalize the energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants.
Written by physicist Joshua Pearce of Clarion University of Pennsylvania, the report has also suggested that nuclear energy production must increase by more than 10 percent each year from 2010 to 2050 to meet all future energy demands and replace fossil fuels.
Nuclear power produces a lot of heat as a byproduct and this directly heats the Earth. This is only a relatively small effect, but as energy consumption grows it must be taken into consideration when balancing the energy equation.
However, it is the whole-of-life cycle analysis that Pearce has investigated that shows nuclear power is far from the “emission-free panacea” claimed by many of its proponents.
Each stage of the nuclear-fuel cycle including power plant construction, mining/milling uranium ores, fuel conversion, enrichment or de-enrichment of nuclear weapons, fabrication, operation, decommissioning, and for short and long-term waste disposal contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, said Pearce.
Pearce’s analysis is based on current practice in the United States with regard to the mining and enrichment of ore.
He has suggested that rather than abandoning nuclear power, efforts should be made to improve its efficiency considerably.
First, we could start utilizing only the highest-concentration ores and switch to fuel enrichment based on gas centrifuge technology, which is much more energy-efficient than current gaseous diffusion methods.
Also, nuclear plants might be used as combined heat and power systems so the “waste” heat is used, rather than allowing them to vent huge quantities of heat to the environment at the end of the electricity generation cycle.
Pearce also suggested that nuclear weapons stockpiles could be “down-blend” to produce nuclear power plant fuel. (ANI)
Related Stories
- IAEA chief to discuss Iran standoff in Germany - April 15, 2008
- Iran to build more nuclear power plants - August 19, 2008
- India ready to provide home for n-fuel bank: Menon - April 19, 2008
- Iran to build second enrichment plant by March 2009 - April 9, 2008
- Natural gas and synthetic fuels most water-efficient energy sources - April 19, 2008
- No reprocessing activities at nuclear centres: Iran - June 1, 2008
- Private players in n-power may be allowed: scientist - October 3, 2008
- Meghalaya rejects N-plant, oppose uranium mining - May 10, 2008
- Russia urges Slovakia to join its uranium enrichment centre - April 4, 2008
- Russia delivers fuel to Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant - January 22, 2008
- Key policy changes needed to free India’s n-power business - September 12, 2008
- Iran designs second nuke power plant - August 25, 2008
- Iran could reconsider uranium enrichment with fuel guarantees - October 3, 2008
- Iran invites Gulf States to develop jointly nuclear plants - December 2, 2008
- Ukraine signs nuclear fuel deal with US firm - March 31, 2008
- centrifuge technology
- clarion university of pennsylvania
- electricity generation
- energy consumption
- energy equation
- fuel conversion
- gas centrifuge
- gaseous diffusion
- greenhouse gas emissions
- joshua pearce
- nuclear energy production
- nuclear fuel cycle
- nuclear plants
- nuclear power plants
- nuclear weapons stockpiles
- power efficiency
- power plant construction
- quantities of heat
- states with regard
- uranium ores
Posted in Health Science, |


March 6th, 2008 at 5:27 am
Pearce is an assistant professor at Clarion and environmental activist whose primary focus is solar power. It’s not surprising to find him down on nuclear power and indeed, his conclusions are ludicrous. Nuclear power is hundreds of millions of times more energetic than chemical power; the idea that there’s some net “energy imbalance” from mining ore is laughable at best.
Hundreds of physicists with actual experience in nuclear power have long since pointed out that the technology is sustainable for many thousands of years of power generation.
Relating to uranium stocks, Pearce ignores the fact that we essentially stopped exploring for uranium almost 40 years ago…and we had barely begun when we stopped.
Uranium is quite abundant in the earth’s crust; basing any analysis off known stockpiles is pure bunkum. Furthermore, reactors can run off thorium as easily as uranium — and thorium is 3X more prevalent.