Random Image

DENVER - AUGUST 25:  Michelle Obama, wife of presumptive Democratic nominee U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), speaks during day one

DENVER - AUGUST 25: Michelle Obama, wife of presumptive Democratic nominee U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), speaks during day one

Random Album

2008 Democratic National Convention: Day 3

2008 Democratic National Convention: Day 3

Subscribe via E-Mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search


web stats

New power plants might cannibalize energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants

March 5th, 2008 - 5:08 pm ICT by admin -

Send to a Friend:





Send to a friend:

Washington, March 5 (ANI): A new report has determined that unless there is a major improvement in nuclear power efficiency, each new power plant will simply cannibalize the energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants.

Written by physicist Joshua Pearce of Clarion University of Pennsylvania, the report has also suggested that nuclear energy production must increase by more than 10 percent each year from 2010 to 2050 to meet all future energy demands and replace fossil fuels.

Nuclear power produces a lot of heat as a byproduct and this directly heats the Earth. This is only a relatively small effect, but as energy consumption grows it must be taken into consideration when balancing the energy equation.

However, it is the whole-of-life cycle analysis that Pearce has investigated that shows nuclear power is far from the “emission-free panacea” claimed by many of its proponents.

Each stage of the nuclear-fuel cycle including power plant construction, mining/milling uranium ores, fuel conversion, enrichment or de-enrichment of nuclear weapons, fabrication, operation, decommissioning, and for short and long-term waste disposal contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, said Pearce.

Pearce’s analysis is based on current practice in the United States with regard to the mining and enrichment of ore.

He has suggested that rather than abandoning nuclear power, efforts should be made to improve its efficiency considerably.

First, we could start utilizing only the highest-concentration ores and switch to fuel enrichment based on gas centrifuge technology, which is much more energy-efficient than current gaseous diffusion methods.

Also, nuclear plants might be used as combined heat and power systems so the “waste” heat is used, rather than allowing them to vent huge quantities of heat to the environment at the end of the electricity generation cycle.

Pearce also suggested that nuclear weapons stockpiles could be “down-blend” to produce nuclear power plant fuel. (ANI)




Posted in Health Science, |

One Response

  1. Michael Asher Says:

    Pearce is an assistant professor at Clarion and environmental activist whose primary focus is solar power. It’s not surprising to find him down on nuclear power and indeed, his conclusions are ludicrous. Nuclear power is hundreds of millions of times more energetic than chemical power; the idea that there’s some net “energy imbalance” from mining ore is laughable at best.

    Hundreds of physicists with actual experience in nuclear power have long since pointed out that the technology is sustainable for many thousands of years of power generation.

    Relating to uranium stocks, Pearce ignores the fact that we essentially stopped exploring for uranium almost 40 years ago…and we had barely begun when we stopped.

    Uranium is quite abundant in the earth’s crust; basing any analysis off known stockpiles is pure bunkum. Furthermore, reactors can run off thorium as easily as uranium — and thorium is 3X more prevalent.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.


RSS feed for comments on New power plants might cannibalize energy produced by earlier nuclear power plants