New lie-detection methods not better than old ones, says expertJune 3rd, 2009 - 4:36 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, June 3 (ANI): A renowned scholar has cast doubts on the efficiency of new lie-detection methods.
The conventional truth-seeking technologies have been replaced by new brain-based techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and the electroencephalography(EEG)-based technology known as Brain Fingerprinting(r).
However, University of Illinois professor Melissa Littlefield dismisses today’s “forensically sophisticated” polygraphy as dated and unreliable.
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Brain Fingerprinting(r) have been hailed as the next, best technologies for lie detection in America, particularly in the context of post-9/11 anxiety,” said Littlefield.
“Far from describing the brain and its functions, fMRI and Brain Fingerprinting(r) produce models of the brain that reinforce social notions of deception, truth and deviance,” she added.
Littlefield is unconvinced that the new technologies are necessarily superior to the old ones.
She believes that polygraphy may have more in common with the new technologies than many scientists - particularly neuroscientists - would suggest.
“They would argue that traditional polygraphy tests the autonomic nervous system. That’s respiration, heart rate, pulse, electrical skin conductance,” she said.
Littlefield said using the old-fashioned lie detector, “you’re not really getting deception so much as your body’s reaction to the stress of deception.”
“And they would argue that (with) fMRI, since it’s scanning the brain, we’re getting closer to the central nervous system, not dealing with the peripheral nervous system.
“We’re dealing with what some say is ‘the organ of deceit’ - where the lies are happening, she added.
The old and the new deception-detection tools basically rely on the same three assumptions.
“The first one is that lies are somehow measurable - that you can see them in the body through increased breathing, heart rate … or by looking at the brain.”
In the latter case, she said, “colloquially, people say ‘your brain lights up’ in the fMRI scanner.”
“The second common assumption, she said, is that “when you look at the body and get some kind of information - whether it’s pulse rate or blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals, or whatever it is that each is measuring - that somehow you’re able to see the body in action without needing any interpretation.”
Finally, she said, “they share this assumption that truth and deception are somehow connected. In deception studies, if you’re looking at the polygraph or you’re looking at the fMRI, the assumption is that truth is the baseline - the factual, the basic, the natural. And to lie is to add a story on top of the truth.”
The article is published in journal Science, Technology & Human Values. (ANI)
- Protein-rich breakfast wards off overeating - May 20, 2011
- Seeing brain activity helps people improve their ability to control thoughts - Apr 09, 2011
- Brain's crossed wires cause depression - Dec 09, 2011
- New study examines brain processes behind facial recognition - Apr 19, 2011
- Dogs pay close attention to human signals - May 06, 2012
- People lie more online than in face-to-face chats - Mar 06, 2011
- A broken heart 'hurts' just as much as intense physical pain - Mar 29, 2011
- Brain wiring makes women anorexic or obese - May 15, 2012
- How coaching with compassion 'lights up' our brain - Nov 18, 2010
- Dream content measured for first time - Oct 30, 2011
- Recreational Ecstasy use linked to loss of brain efficiency - May 04, 2011
- Acupuncture really does change brain's perception of pain - Dec 01, 2010
- Brain area critical for forming unconscious memories identified - Dec 16, 2010
- What goes on in a woman's mind during an orgasm - Nov 08, 2010
- How we see the world around us depends on our brain's architecture - Dec 06, 2010
Tags: autonomic nervous system, central nervous system, deception detection, detection tools, deviance, electroencephalography, fmri, functional magnetic resonance, functional magnetic resonance imaging, heart rate, illinois professor, lie detection, lie detector, littlefield, magnetic resonance imaging, new brain, peripheral nervous system, polygraphy, renowned scholar, skin conductance