New climate treaty could save some species, but increase risk to othersNovember 17th, 2009 - 5:52 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, November 17 (ANI): Scientists believe that plans to be discussed at the forthcoming UN climate conference in Copenhagen to cut deforestation in developing countries could save some species from extinction, but inadvertently increase the risk to others.
A team of eleven of the world’s top tropical forest scientists, coordinated by the University of Leeds, UK, warn that while cutting clearance of carbon-rich tropical forests will help reduce climate change and save species in those forests, governments could risk neglecting other forests that are home to large numbers of endangered species.
Under new UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) proposals, the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) scheme would curb carbon emissions by financially rewarding tropical countries that reduce deforestation.
Governments implicitly assume that this is a win-win scheme, benefiting climate and species.
Tropical forests contain half of all species and half of all carbon stored in terrestrial vegetation, and their destruction accounts for 18 percent of global carbon emissions.
However, scientists warn that if REDD focuses solely on protecting forests with the greatest density of carbon, some biodiversity may be sacrificed.
“Concentrations of carbon density and biodiversity in tropical forests only partially overlap,” said Dr Alan Grainger of the University of Leeds, joint leader of the international team.
“We are concerned that governments will focus on cutting deforestation in the most carbon-rich forests, only for clearance pressures to shift to other high biodiversity forests which are not given priority for protection because they are low in carbon,” he added.
“If personnel and funds are switched from existing conservation areas, they too could be at risk, and this would make matters even worse,” he further added.
If REDD is linked to carbon markets then biodiversity hotspot areas - home to endemic species most at risk of extinction as their habitats are shrinking rapidly - could be at an additional disadvantage, because of the higher costs of protecting them.
According to early estimates up to 50 percent of tropical biodiversity hotspot areas could be excluded from REDD for these reasons.
Fortunately, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change is still negotiating the design of REDD and how it is to be implemented. (ANI)
- 'World forest observatory' needed to cut deforestation rates, say scientists - Dec 01, 2009
- Countries argue over how to save forests - Oct 26, 2010
- Massive deforestation leading to climate change, species loss - Dec 08, 2008
- Reducing deforestation results in more fires: Study - Jun 12, 2010
- The Climate Change Terminology (To go with Curtain Raiser) - Nov 27, 2011
- Copenhagen talks must include forest dwellers, says scientist - Dec 04, 2009
- Cocaine production speeding up destruction of Colombia's rainforests - Feb 10, 2011
- Can tropical forests save the world? (Comment-Countdown to Copenhagen) - Nov 17, 2009
- Save 587 sites to save life, urge scientists - Oct 26, 2010
- First high-resolution maps of carbon trapped in tropical forests revealed - Sep 07, 2010
- UNEP to support Indian stand on forestry - Dec 07, 2009
- Adapting to warming could worsen climate change - Aug 07, 2010
- Cambodia's new park protects tigers, elephants and CO2 - Oct 25, 2009
- Forest conservation may have negative impacts on some ecosystems - Jun 13, 2008
- Saving forests five times better than carbon capture for climate action - Oct 12, 2009
Tags: alan grainger, biodiversity, climate conference, climate treaty, conservation areas, deforestation, dr alan, endangered species, forest scientists, framework convention on climate change, global carbon emissions, redd, rich forests, terrestrial vegetation, tropical countries, tropical forest, tropical forests, un framework convention on climate change, university of leeds, university of leeds uk