Need for evaluation and regulation of ‘electronic cigarettes’, say experts
February 11th, 2010 - 2:45 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Feb 11 (ANI): A study has called for evaluation and regulation of ‘electronic cigarettes’, claiming that they should be labeled and packaged in a manner consistent with cartridge content and product effect - even if that effect is a total failure to deliver nicotine.
The failure part was demonstrated by a study supported by the National Cancer Institute and led by a Virginia Commonwealth University researcher.
The research was published in the Online First issue of the journal Tobacco Control.
Electronic cigarettes consist of a battery, heater and cartridge containing a solution of nicotine, propylene glycol and other chemicals and have been marketed to deliver nicotine without tobacco toxicants. Despite no published data concerning safety or efficacy, these products are sold in shopping malls and online.
“Consumers have a right to expect that products marketed to deliver a drug will work safely and as promised. Our findings demonstrate that the ‘electronic cigarettes’ that we tested do not deliver the drug they are supposed to deliver. It’s not just that they delivered less nicotine than a cigarette. Rather, they delivered no measurable nicotine at all. In terms of nicotine delivery, these products were as effective as puffing from an unlit cigarette,” said principal investigator Thomas Eissenberg, Ph.D., professor in the VCU Department of Psychology.
“Regulation can protect consumers from unsafe and ineffective products, but these products have somehow avoided regulation thus far. Our results suggest that consumers interested in safe and effective nicotine delivery need to be very wary of unregulated “electronic cigarettes,” said Eissenberg.
In Eissenberg’s study, 16 participants engaged in four different sessions - each separated by 48 hours - which included smoking their preferred brand of cigarettes, puffing an unlit cigarette, or using one of two different brands of “electronic cigarettes” loaded with “high” strength, which is 16 mg, nicotine cartridges. Eissenberg and his team measured the level of nicotine in the participants’ blood and also their heart rate and craving for a cigarette/nicotine.
They observed that when participants used the two brands of “electronic cigarettes,” there was no significant increase in nicotine levels or heart rate, and little reduction in craving. However, when participants smoked their own brand of cigarettes, substantial and significant increases in plasma nicotine and heart rate, and decreases in craving were observed. (ANI)
- Smoking tobacco through waterpipe as harmful as puffing on cigarette - Dec 03, 2009
- Electronic ciggies need stronger puffs than conventional brands - Jul 29, 2010
- Want to quit smoking? Get professional help - Jan 04, 2011
- Experts call for ban on e-ciggies until safety concerns are addressed - Dec 07, 2010
- E- ciggies much safer than real ones: Study - Dec 17, 2010
- e-cigarettes are potentially harmful - Dec 05, 2010
- US Govt 'to regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco' - Apr 26, 2011
- E-ciggies 'are a promising tool to help smokers quit' - Feb 09, 2011
- E-cigarettes can help kick the butt - Apr 19, 2010
- Heigl dependent on electronic cigarettes - Jul 17, 2010
- Electronic ciggies pose health risks: Study - Dec 04, 2010
- Smokeless cigarettes less harmful - Feb 21, 2012
- Now a helpline to quit tobacco - May 29, 2012
- Why you shouldn't light up right after waking up - Jun 08, 2010
- As hookah becomes in, it raises health concerns (Lifestyle Feature) - May 06, 2012
Tags: chemicals, cigarettes, consumers, delivery need, department of psychology, efficacy, journal tobacco control, national cancer institute, nicotine, nicotine delivery, preferred brand, principal investigator, propylene glycol, sessions, shopping malls, thomas eissenberg, toxicants, university researcher, unlit cigarette, virginia commonwealth university