Most wars occur in Earths richest biological regions, reveals studyFebruary 21st, 2009 - 5:37 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Feb 21 (ANI): A new study has found that more than 80 percent of the worlds major armed conflicts from 1950-2000 occurred in regions identified as the most biologically diverse and threatened places on Earth.
Titled Warfare in Biodiversity Hotspots, the study by leading international conservation scientists compared major conflict zones with the Earths 34 biodiversity hotspots identified by Conservation International (CI).
The hotspots are considered top conservation priorities because they contain the entire populations of more than half of all plant species and at least 42 percent of all vertebrates, and are highly threatened.
This astounding conclusion that the richest storehouses of life on Earth are also the regions of the most human conflict tells us that these areas are essential for both biodiversity conservation and human well-being, said Russell A. Mittermeier, president of Conservation International (CI) and an author of the study.
Millions of the worlds poorest people live in hotspots and depend on healthy ecosystems for their survival, so there is a moral obligation as well as political and social responsibility - to protect these places and all the resources and services they provide, he added.
The study found that more than 90 percent of major armed conflicts defined as those resulting in more than 1,000 deaths occurred in countries that contain one of the 34 biodiversity hotspots, while 81 percent took place within specific hotspots.
A total of 23 hotspots experienced warfare over the half-century studied.
Examples of the nature-conflict connection include the Vietnam War, when poisonous Agent Orange destroyed forest cover and coastal mangroves, and timber harvesting that funded war chests in Liberia, Cambodia and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
In those and countless other cases, the collateral damage of war harmed both the biological wealth of the region and the ability of people to live off of it.
In addition, war refugees must hunt, gather firewood or build encampments to survive, increasing the pressure on local resources.
More weapons means increased hunting for bush meat and widespread poaching that can decimate wildlife populations.
The consequences extend far beyond the actual fighting, said lead author Thor Hanson of the University of Idaho.
War preparations and lingering post-conflict activities also have important implications for biodiversity hotspots and the people who live there, he added.
The fact that so many conflicts have occurred in areas of high biodiversity loss and natural resource degradation warrants much further investigation as to the underlying causes, and strongly highlights the importance of these areas for global security, Mittermeier said. (ANI)
Tags: agent orange, biodiversity conservation, biodiversity hotspots, biological wealth, coastal mangroves, collateral damage, conflict zones, congo drc, conservation international, conservation priorities, conservation scientists, democratic republic of congo, forest cover, human conflict, international conservation, life on earth, moral obligation, republic of congo, vietnam war, war chests