Moral psychology study sheds light on the origin of religionFebruary 9th, 2010 - 5:54 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Feb 9 (ANI): A new moral psychology research has offered more insight into the origins of religion.
Study co-author Dr. Ilkka Pyysiainen from the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies said: “Some scholars claim that religion evolved as an adaptation to solve the problem of cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals, while others propose that religion emerged as a by-product of pre-existing cognitive capacities.”
While there is some support for both, these alternative theories have been difficult to investigate.
Dr. Pyysiainen and co-author Dr. Marc Hauser, from the Departments of Psychology and Human Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University, used a fresh perspective based in experimental moral psychology to review these two competing theories.
Dr. Hauser said: “We were interested in making use of this perspective because religion is linked to morality in different ways…For some, there is no morality without religion, while others see religion as merely one way of expressing one’s moral intuitions.”
Refering to several studies in moral psychology, the authors draw attention to the finding that despite differences in, or even an absence of, religious backgrounds, individuals show no difference in moral judgments for unfamiliar moral dilemmas. The research found that intuitive judgments of right and wrong seem to operate independently of explicit religious commitments.
Dr. Pyysiainen said: “This supports the theory that religion did not originally emerge as a biological adaptation for cooperation, but evolved as a separate by-product of pre-existing cognitive functions that evolved from non-religious functions.
“However, although it appears as if cooperation is made possible by mental mechanisms that are not specific to religion, religion can play a role in facilitating and stabilizing cooperation between groups.”
Dr. Hauser concluded: “It seems that in many cultures religious concepts and beliefs have become the standard way of conceptualizing moral intuitions. Although, as we discuss in our paper, this link is not a necessary one, many people have become so accustomed to using it, that criticism targeted at religion is experienced as a fundamental threat to our moral existence.”
The study has appeared in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences on February 8. (ANI)
- 'Religion made us human' - Jun 06, 2010
- More people turn to god in societies under stress - Aug 09, 2011
- Computers may one day solve problems as creatively as humans - Dec 02, 2010
- Beliefs, disbeliefs about God governed by same cerebral areas - Oct 12, 2009
- Analytical thinking can erode religious belief: Study - Apr 27, 2012
- Infant brains are primed with 'intuitive physics' - Jan 25, 2012
- Atheists, agnostics kinder than religious people - May 01, 2012
- Intuitive thinking may explain greater faith in god - Sep 21, 2011
- Women's prejudice linked to their biology - Jun 23, 2011
- Mindfulness is the best antidote to stress - Nov 01, 2011
- Our gut feelings can cut both ways - good or bad - Jan 05, 2011
- How the human brain learns language - Apr 30, 2010
- Two people can learn to cooperate with each other intuitively: Study - Oct 29, 2010
- Generosity is natural to humans - Jul 26, 2011
- Research says that praying when angry helps to manage anger - Mar 31, 2011
Tags: biological adaptation, cognitive capacities, cognitive functions, dr hauser, harvard university, human evolutionary biology, ilkka pyysiainen, marc hauser, mental mechanisms, moral intuitions, moral judgments, moral psychology, origins of religion, psychology research, psychology study, religion study, religious backgrounds, religious commitments, religious concepts, religious functions