Mass extinctions “change evolution rules”
September 5th, 2010 - 5:11 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Sept5 (ANI): A new study from Macquarie University has analyzed why global mass extinctions occur - whether they are just short-term diversions in life’s preordained course, or spring up completely new paths of evolution.
“Mass extinction fundamentally changes the dynamics. It changes the composition of the biosphere forever. You can’t simply predict the winners and losers from what groups have done before,” Wired News quoted paleobiologist John Alroy as saying.
Some believe that, in the absence of extinctions, species would diversify endlessly. Others argue that each taxonomic group had limits; once it reached a certain size, each branch would stop growing.
Palaeontologist Jack Sepkoski proposed that, by looking at the rate at which each group produced new species, one could predict the winners and losers of each mass extinction’s aftermath. Groups that diversified rapidly would flourish. Their destiny was already established.
“It’s a clockmaker vision of evolution. Each group has fixed dynamics, and if there’s an extinction, it just messes it up a bit,” said Alroy.
“That’s what I’m challenging in this paper. There are limits, and that’s why we don’t have a trillion species. But those limits can change,” he said.
Alroy crunched marine fossil data in the Paleobiology Database, which gathers specimen records from nearly 100,000 fossil collections around the world.
He didn’t find Sepkoski’s correlation between pre-mass-extinction diversity rates and post-extinction success. Each mass extinction event seemed to change the rules. Past didn’t indicate future.
But paleontologist Charles Marshall of the University of California, Berkeley noted that Alroy’s statistical methods still need review by the paleobiology community.
“There will be no immediate consensus on the details of the pattern of diversity,” he wrote. But “the pieces are falling into place.”
Alroy’s analysis suggests that the future is inherently unpredictable, that what comes next can’t be extrapolated from what is measured now.
“The current mass extinction is not going to simply put things out of whack for a while, and then things will go back to where we started, or would have gone anyway,” said Alroy. (ANI)
- Corals, big mammals to go extinct in future catastrophic event? - Sep 03, 2010
- Is Earth already on the brink of 6th mass extinction? - Mar 03, 2011
- Extreme weather threatens rich ecosystems - Apr 01, 2012
- New genetic study helps solve Darwin's mystery of evolution of flowering plants - Apr 11, 2011
- 250-mn-yrs old population of trilobites fossilized during orgy discovered - Mar 17, 2011
- Mass extinction event in North America occurred in a 'geological instant' - Nov 28, 2009
- Ancient global warming turned earth an inferno - Nov 18, 2011
- Fossil site in China offers clues to mass extinction recovery - Dec 23, 2010
- Species accumulating on Earth at slower rates than in the past: Study - Sep 30, 2010
- Dinosaurs probably had lice: Study - Apr 06, 2011
- Palaeontologists Unearth New Primate In Egypt - May 12, 2010
- Single dinosaur community populated North America - Apr 24, 2010
- Humans, climate changed wiped out Ice Age mammals - Nov 06, 2011
- 55mn-yr-old horse fossils indicate 'you are what you eat' - Mar 04, 2011
- 'Walking cactus' sheds light on the evolution of insects, spiders - Feb 24, 2011
Tags: biosphere, charles marshall, correlation, diversions, fossil collections, fossil data, john alroy, macquarie university, mass extinction event, mass extinctions, messes, palaeontologist, paleobiology database, paleontologist, specimen records, statistical methods, taxonomic group, trillion, university of california berkeley, winners and losers