Married couples better at dealing with health shocks than singlesDecember 29th, 2009 - 2:08 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, Dec 29 (ANI): If you’re married, you are better able to cope economically with disability and health shocks, according to a new study.
In the working paper by University of British Columbia economists Giovanni Gallipoli and Laura Turner, researchers examined data from the Canadian Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) and found that in marriages, “main-earners” (typically husbands) tend to transfer income and compensate “second-earners” (typically wives).
The second-earners, in turn, provide conditional time and care in periods of need (such as illness and disability of main-earner).
The insurance the second-earner provides to the main-earner in the marital contract serves as an important mechanism to help smooth out household income in periods of health and disability shocks to the main-earner; and as a way to support the future earning potential of the main-earner, said Gallipoli.
The researchers also found that the relative value of marriage changes in different ways for men and women as they age.
Men who receive bad shocks early in life may lose the insurance offered by marriage by being sorted out of possible matches in the early stages, according to the study.
Marriages become more stable the longer the couple is together, and uncertainty is resolved.
The long-term costs associated to health shocks are particularly high for main-earners in the early stages of their working life, because they imply a permanent loss of human capital and earning potential.
Other findings include that “low-risk” marriages, where the main-earner is in a low-risk health state, are more stable and encounter less renegotiation and termination of marital contracts at every stage of the life-cycle.
The researchers also found that men who are at high risk of receiving health and disability shocks value marriage early in life, when they are poor in both assets and work experience.
As these husbands age, their gains from marriage decrease as “buffer stocks” of human capital and assets are accumulated and they become more likely to trigger a renegotiation of the marital contract. These later renegotiations are referred to by the authors as a “midlife crisis.”
All men value marriage at the late stages of their working life as they approach retirement, and the end of their main-earner status, as well as during periods of high health risk. (ANI)
- Couples better able to cope with health shocks - Dec 29, 2009
- A sneak-peak into marriage, chores, careers and divorce in ancient Egypt - Jul 09, 2010
- Healthy lifestyle has biggest impact on cardiovascular health - Nov 16, 2010
- What makes a healthy, happy marriage? - Jun 01, 2010
- 70 percent Chinese have pre-marital sex: Study - Apr 10, 2012
- Insurance regulator faces actuarial vacuum - May 24, 2011
- 77.3 million baby boomers face bleak future - Apr 17, 2012
- Highest net asset value cover plans are risky: IRDA chief - Sep 15, 2011
- Non-life insurers log 17 percent growth in first quarter - Jul 12, 2012
- Insurers relieved as Tamil Nadu scraps health scheme - Jun 10, 2011
- Smoking hasten cardiac problems, cancer in youngsters (May 31 is World No Tobacco Day) - May 30, 2012
- Chola MS General targets Rs.1,400 crore premium in 2011-12 - Jun 02, 2011
- Polaris launches new insurance claims processing solution - May 21, 2012
- Profitability big challenge for Indian insurers: Report - Apr 11, 2011
- Chinese women prefer men who own house - Dec 24, 2010
Tags: age men, canadian survey, earners, earning potential, economists, gallipoli, health shocks, health state, high risk, household income, income dynamics, laura turner, life cycle, marriage changes, married couples, relative value, renegotiation, university of british columbia, women as they age, work experience