Incoming stimuli behind neuronal diversity
August 30th, 2010 - 3:51 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Aug 30 (ANI): A new study has revealed that it’s not the size or shape that but the way neuron responds to incoming stimuli that sets one neuron apart from another.
Carnegie Mellon University researchers have said that this diversity is critical to overall brain function and essential in how neurons process complex stimuli and code information.
“I think neuroscientists have, at an intuitive level, recognized the variability between neurons, but we swept it under the rug because we didn’t consider that diversity could be a feature. Rather, we looked at it as a fundamental reflection of the imprecision of biology,” Nature quoted Nathan N. Urban of CMU’s Department of Biological Sciences as saying.
“We wanted to reconsider that notion. Perhaps this diversity is important - maybe it serves some function,” he said.
Urban and Krishnan Padmanabhan of CMU tested single neurons’ responses to a complex stimulus. By placing an electrical probe into individual excitatory neurons called mitral cells and exposing them to a complex computer-controlled noise stimulus, the researchers were able to determine how each cell responded.
They found that out of the dozens of neurons they tested, no two had the exact same response. While the researchers believed that these results were striking on their own, it led them to wonder whether or not the neurons were giving a messy version of a single response, or if they were each providing different pieces of information about the stimulus.
To test their hypothesis, the CMU researchers used a tool called spike-triggered averaging that allowed them to determine what feature of the stimulus causes each neuron to respond.
They found that some responded to rapid changes in the stimulus and others to slower changes; still other neurons responded when the input signal changed in a regular or rhythmic way.
The researchers then computed the information contained in the outputs of highly diverse sets of neurons and compared it to that of groups of more similar neurons.
They found that the heterogeneous groups of neurons transmitted two times as much information about the stimulus than the homogeneous group.
“A population in which each member is a little different in terms of what they can do is a more efficient and more effective population. It’s like a baseball team - if you want to win, you shouldn’t put nine pitchers on the field,” Urban said.
Aside from its role in information coding, the researchers believe neuronal diversity also could play a role in neurological disorders like epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia.
The findings were published in Nature Neuroscience. (ANI)
- How neurons in the brain decide how to transmit information - Mar 26, 2011
- Better brain implants with the help of neurons - Jul 10, 2011
- What prevents zebrafish from biting off more than it can chew? - Nov 02, 2010
- Technique 'poised to untangle brain's complexity' developed - Apr 11, 2011
- Why teens are more vulnerable to drug addiction, behavioral disorders - Jan 27, 2011
- Neural thermostat that keeps brain running efficiently found - Jan 14, 2010
- Adult brain is continually modified by experience, finds study - Jun 16, 2010
- Brain cells recognise whole face, not parts - Oct 02, 2011
- Mechanism in the brain's computation of sound location identified - Jun 30, 2010
- Neuroscientists track how brain cells process information - Jul 13, 2011
- Gene study uncovers clues to memory and learning - Feb 16, 2011
- Bees beat computers in solving complex problems - Oct 26, 2010
- Scientists decode how brain records thought-word connect - Jan 13, 2010
- Simulator to test blood platelets in virtual heart attacks invented - Jun 21, 2010
- Brain-like computing power edges close to reality - Jun 24, 2011
Tags: biological sciences, brain function, carnegie mellon university, CMU, complex computer, dozens, hypothesis, imprecision, input signal, intuitive level, neuron, neuronal diversity, notion, padmanabhan, rapid changes, reflection, stimuli, stimulus, university researchers, variability