“Hobbits” may owe their peculiarities to genetic mutations
January 4th, 2008 - 4:39 pm ICT by admin - Send to a friend:
Washington, January 4 (ANI): Scientists have discovered that a rare disease called microcephaly, characterized by small brain and body size but near normal intelligence, is caused by mutations in a gene coding for the protein pericentrin.
The new finding has led the researchers to speculate that the condition may explain the tiny, hobbit-like people that occupied a remote Indonesian island about 18,000 years ago.
It has also fuelled the debate over whether the unusual creatures were a new species, or just diseased modern humans.
Pericentrin helps separate chromosomes during cell division, which is needed for growth.
“The whole body loses its capacity to grow, because cell division is so difficult for people with this defect,” National Geographic quoted study co-author Anita Rauch of the Institute for Human Genetics at the University of Erlangen in Germany, as saying.
It is said that microcephaly sufferers on average grow about three feet tall, and have a brain the size of a three-month-old baby. They also exhibit subtle bony anomalies in their hands and wrists, skull asymmetry, small chins, abnormal teeth, and abnormal shoulders. However, their intelligence is near normal.
Rauch said that the description of the hobbit-like people is very similar to that of modern humans with this genetic defect.
Upon being discovered in 2004 on the Indonesian island of Flores, the hobbit was hailed as a new species, Homo floresiensis, by the scientists. Since then, it is being debated whether the hobbit are a new species or a modern human with microcephaly.
The new study links the genetic mutations to a type of microcephaly.
“We think it is very likely that Homo floresiensis indeed had a pericentrin mutation,” Rauch said.
Richard Potts, director of the human origins program at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., said that the new study’s link between genetics and human growth was “neat”.
He, however, disagreed with the suggestion that Homo floresiensis represents a modern human with a genetic disorder. He said that evidence of the hobbit being a unique species was found in recent detailed studies of its wrist and upper arm bone, which showed that its wrist bones were very similar to that of gorillas or chimpanzees.
He insisted that genetic diseases, including any type of microcephaly, do not result in an apelike wrist similar to the hobbit’s.
“For many of us in the field, we have taken those studies, especially the one [on the wrist bone] as really being the death blow to the idea that we’re dealing with a modern human,” Potts said.
He further said that even if a gene associated with dwarfism was found in the hobbit, the researchers would “still have to go down to the details of the morphology and try to explain (them).” (ANI)
Related Stories
- Hobbits relatives may have existed in northern Australia - May 27, 2008
- Hobbit may represent an entirely new species - December 18, 2008
- ‘Hobbits’ were different from us, after all - December 18, 2008
- Prehistoric hobbits walked more like clowns than humans - April 17, 2008
- Hobbit might have been human suffering from stunted growth - March 5, 2008
- Prehistoric Hobbits remains do not show signs of growth disorders - April 28, 2008
- Hobbit might have been a modern human with a growth disorder - April 21, 2008
- Worlds First European confirmed to be 1.2 million years old - March 27, 2008
- Our earliest human ancestors may have walked upright 6 million years ago - March 21, 2008
- Spanish discovery sheds light on early humans in Europe - March 29, 2008
- Scientists find 6 ancient bat species in Egypt - March 7, 2008
- Scientists find 6 ancient bat species in Egypt (re-issue) - March 9, 2008
- Modern humans may have evolved 80,000 years earlier than previously thought - December 4, 2008
- Human speech may have originated earlier than believed - July 9, 2008
- Invasive species can evolve to suit new place - March 11, 2008
- brain and body
- chins
- gene coding
- genetic defect
- genetic mutations
- hobbit like
- homo floresiensis
- human genetics
- human origins program
- indonesian island
- island of flores
- microcephaly
- month old baby
- peculiarities
- rare disease
- richard potts
- skull asymmetry
- smithsonian institution
- species homo
- university of erlangen
Posted in Health Science, |


January 7th, 2008 at 8:05 am
I was the first (in October 2004) to suggest that the so-called Homo floresiensis is simply a modern human with a growth disorder causing microcephaly. In February 2005, together with a group of Indonesian, Australian and American colleagues, I have studied original skeletal remains of the “hobbit” from the Liang Bua, Flores. These studies confirmed my initial diagnosis. We published our results in a major paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [USA] in August 2006 (Jacob et al.). Palaeoanthropologists, like Dr Potts, are defending the idea of a “new species” because admitting to the individual being just a pathological human specimen would undermine standing of palaeoanthropology. We have written a book (”The Hobbit Trap” by M. Henneberg and J.Schofield, Wakefield Press 2008) that will be published early in 2008. It describes the debate and provides further justification for the interpretation of the Liang Bua finds as microcephalic. It also explains in some detail the background of “academic politics” resulting in the debate and repeated statements by palaeoanthropologists that the “hobbit” was a separate species.
January 7th, 2008 at 11:03 pm
I love these types of arguments but frankly, I wish there were more specimens available to address these ongoing debates. It’s getting tiresome hearing this wrangling about this single find. The discovery of Homo floresiensis could be one of the great stories in human evolution and hopefully we’ll know more once the original research team gets back to the caves in Flores and to the other islands. Hard to believe, but their work was halted by the Indonesian government at one point further adding fuel to this mess.
Of course, I have a vested interest in this discovery, having written a fictional adventure novel called Flores Girl on the recent fossil find. If you are interested, there is more on this ongoing controversy about Homo floresiensis at http://www.floresgirl.com or catch the free Flores girl podcast at Podiobooks.com.