Hippo ancestry disputed by scientistsMarch 19th, 2009 - 3:36 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, March 19 (ANI): A team of scientists has rebutted a recent study that creates a different family tree for the hippo.
The team included Jessica Theodor, an associate professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Calgary, and her colleague Jonathan Geisler, associate professor at Georgia Southern University.
The study, by J. G. M. Thewissen, a professor at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, suggested that whales are more closely linked to an extinct pig-like animal, often known as Indias pig or Indohyus, while hippos are closely related to living pigs.
But, this isnt accurate according to Theodor.
What Thewissen is saying is that Indohyus is the closest relative of whales - and we agree. Where we think he is wrong, is that he is saying that that hippos are more closely related to true pigs than they are to whales, said Theodor.
This contradicts most of the data from DNA from the last 12 or 13 years. Those data place hippos as the closest living relative to whales, she added.
Theodor said that Thewissen did not use DNA evidence, instead used fossil evidence alone to create a family tree and reach the conclusion that hippos have more in common with pigs than whales.
And the reason their tree is so different is simple: by excluding all the DNA information they left out all the data that shows a strong relationship between whales and hippos, she said.
When biologists study family trees, they traditionally rely on morphology, in other words, the shape of bones.
More recently, the DNA revolution means that scientists can use DNA data as another tool to reconstruct family trees, but DNA data cant be used all the time because DNA is not available for most fossils.
In order to get the best understanding, researchers combine the two sources of data in a single analysis. But, what Thewissen and his group did, was leave one of the major ones out, said Theodor.
Before the widespread use of DNA data, hippos had been thought to be closely related to pigs, but DNA data show that whales are closely related to hippos.
Geisler and Theodor argue that leaving out the DNA data not only ignores important information, it implies that the evolution of swimming evolved independently in hippos and whales, when it may have evolved only once in a common ancestor. (ANI)
- Hippos more closely related to whales, not pigs, say researchers - Mar 19, 2009
- How whales and dolphins evolved - Sep 25, 2009
- Pigs' love of mud linked to their evolution - Apr 30, 2011
- "Nutcracker Man" dined on grasses, not nuts one million years ago! - May 03, 2011
- Dinosaurs probably had lice: Study - Apr 06, 2011
- Tiny deer-like mammals were whales ancestors - Dec 20, 2007
- Human evolution occurred '3mn yrs earlier than previously thought' - Nov 06, 2010
- 30,000-yr-old finger bone found in Siberia is from 'mystery human relative' - Dec 23, 2010
- Dinos witnessed Oz bushfires that appeared 50mn yrs earlier than thought - Feb 16, 2011
- Whale sharks can produce many offspring from single mating session - Aug 25, 2010
- Experts suggest ancient fossils 'not human ancestors but extinct cousins' - Feb 17, 2011
- Rockmelons originated in Asia, not Africa - Jul 20, 2010
- Whales' 'sense of smell' may shed light on how they locate prey - Aug 07, 2010
- How whales have changed over 35 million years - May 30, 2010
- New genetic study helps solve Darwin's mystery of evolution of flowering plants - Apr 11, 2011
Tags: biological sciences, biologists, college of medicine, dna data, dna evidence, dna revolution, family trees, fossil evidence, fossils, geisler, georgia southern university, hippo, hippos, jessica theodor, morphology, northeastern ohio universities college of medicine, ohio universities, true pigs, university of calgary, whales