Here’s why people doubt climate changeSeptember 20th, 2010 - 5:31 pm ICT by ANI
Sydney, Sep 20 (ANI): A new study has suggested that the representation of the dangers of global warming has led the people to doubt the phenomenon.
The University of NSW study that brings together climate science and cognitive psychology has revealed that many people don’t believe in global warming because everyday life may have trained them to doubt it.
As the physical science underpinning human-induced climate change has grown more and more solid, more people have been growing sceptical of it.
‘Simply presenting the facts and figures about global warming has failed to convince large portions of the general public, journalists and policy makers about the scale of the problem and the urgency of required action,’ the Sydney Morning Herald quoted the paper as saying.
‘From a psychologist’s perspective, this is not surprising,” it added.
Two Sydney researchers, Ben Newell and Andy Pitman, identified different classes of perfectly normal psychological phenomena that can tend to turn people into so-called climate ‘deniers’.
The first concerns ’sampling issues’ - the idea that people normally try to refer to real-life examples to draw conclusions and may be heavily influenced by recent media coverage.
‘For example, if you read or hear opinions from climate change sceptics about 50 per cent of the time then this could lead to a bias in the perception of the balance of evidence in your mind - that is, that the science is only about 50 per cent certain,’ said Newell.
People are also heavily influenced by ‘framing issues’ - dealing with how information is presented to them. The figure 0.2 means the same as 20 out of 100, but the latter proportion makes the information seem much more concrete.
People construct mental models, which they use to judge new information, and these models are usually built only on a few fragments of information, the study said.
It used the analogy of most people’s understanding of the link between cancer and smoking, which is not completely understood by most researchers yet widely accepted by the general public.
‘By contrast, understanding how and why an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to warming and how and what we do as individuals and communities affects the composition of the atmosphere is much harder,’ said Newell.
The findings were published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. (ANI)
- 'Climategate' undermined belief in global warming among TV meteorologists: Study - Feb 23, 2011
- Now, Twitter chatbot that counters anti-global warming tweets - Nov 10, 2010
- Dust in Earth's atmosphere has doubled since the beginning of 20th century - Jan 09, 2011
- Human-induced global warming requires long-term study - Nov 20, 2011
- Emotionally-charged global warming messages can backfire: Study - Nov 18, 2010
- Hearing 'climate change' causes more panic than 'global warming' - Mar 09, 2011
- Warming could unleash more violent storms, says study - Jul 11, 2012
- Climate change could wipe out rarest forests - Mar 20, 2012
- Carbon lobby blocked deal at Copenhagen: NGO - Mar 24, 2010
- Tree plantation may not fight global warming - May 26, 2011
- Analytical thinking can erode religious belief: Study - Apr 27, 2012
- Reduced sea ice, warming elevate Arctic temperatures - Jul 08, 2012
- Drop in CO2 triggered polar ice sheet formation - Dec 02, 2011
- Climate change will also worsen respiratory diseases - Mar 15, 2012
- NASA to undertake new mission to study arctic climate change - Jun 09, 2010
Tags: analogy, andy pitman, climate change, climate science, cognitive psychology, everyday life, fragments, global warming, media coverage, mental models, morning herald, newell, physical science, psychological phenomena, psychologist, public journalists, sampling issues, sceptics, sydney morning herald, urgency