Harm reduction ciggies ‘more harmful than conventional brands’
October 21st, 2010 - 11:56 am ICT by ANIWashington, Oct 21 (ANI): A new research has revealed that ‘harm reduction cigarettes’, marketed by tobacco companies as safer than conventional brands, could in fact, be more harmful.
Harm reduction cigarettes are made using complex filters or by genetically altering tobacco plants to reduce nicotine concentration.
Stem cell scientists at the University of California, Riverside have found that even sidestream smoke (which burns off the tip of a cigarette) from harm reduction cigarettes impairs growth of human embryonic stem cells more than sidestream smoke from a conventional brand.
“Our analyses show there is significant toxicity in harm reduction products, and our data show that reduction of carcinogens in harm reduction mainstream smoke does not necessarily reduce the toxicity of unfiltered sidestream smoke,” said Prue Talbot, the director of UC Riverside’s Stem Cell Center.
“Embryonic stem cells provide the best model currently available for evaluating the effects of environmental toxicants on prenatal stages of development, which are usually the most sensitive to chemical stress,” said Talbot, a professor of cell biology and neuroscience.
Talbot’s research team examined the following harm-reduction cigarette brands: Marlboro Lights, Advance Premium Lights, and Quest. The team used Marlboro Red cigarettes to represent conventional brands.
The team also found that sidestream smoke was consistently more potent to the embryonic stem cells than mainstream smoke, regardless of whether the cigarette brand was harm reduction or conventional.
Study results appear in the November issue of Toxicological Sciences. (ANI)
- 'Safe' cigarettes more toxic than regular ones: Study - Oct 21, 2010
- Harm-reduction cigarettes more harmful than traditional cigarettes - Dec 09, 2008
- Harm-reduction cigarettes; remedy worse than disease - Dec 09, 2008
- Electronic ciggies pose health risks: Study - Dec 04, 2010
- e-cigarettes are potentially harmful - Dec 05, 2010
- Electronic ciggies need stronger puffs than conventional brands - Jul 29, 2010
- 'Silver', 'gold' and 'slim' cigarettes misleading many smokers - Apr 13, 2011
- Tobacco firm underplayed dangers of smoking - Jan 09, 2012
- Postmenopausal smoking boosts sex hormone levels - Sep 01, 2011
- US made ciggies '3 times more cancerous than foreign counterparts' - Jun 03, 2010
- Novel test may lead to custom-tailored quitting approaches for smokers - Aug 29, 2010
- 'Safe' ciggies as hazardous as tobacco - May 13, 2010
- Tobacco companies may be using YouTube to market products - Aug 26, 2010
- Moist snuff high in carcinogenic content - Dec 03, 2009
- Beware, smoking damages your body within minutes - Jan 16, 2011
Tags: carcinogens, cell biology, chemical stress, cigarette brand, cigarette brands, embryonic stem cells, environmental toxicants, harm reduction, human embryonic stem cells, mainstream smoke, marlboro lights, nicotine, prue, sidestream smoke, stages of development, tobacco companies, tobacco plants, toxicological sciences, uc riverside, university of california riverside