Going veggie may do more harm to the environment than eating meatFebruary 12th, 2010 - 3:03 pm ICT by ANI
London, Feb 12 (ANI): A new study has determined that becoming a vegetarian can do more harm to the environment than continuing to eat red meat.
According to The Times, the study by Cranfield University, commissioned by the environmental group WWF, found that many meat substitutes were produced from soy, chickpeas and lentils that were grown overseas and imported into Britain.
It found that switching from beef and lamb reared in Britain to meat substitutes would result in more foreign land being cultivated and raise the risk of forests being destroyed to create farmland.
Meat substitutes also tended to be highly processed and involved energy-intensive production methods.
Lord Stern of Brentford, one of the world’s leading climate change economists, caused uproar among Britain’s livestock farmers last October when he claimed that a vegetarian diet was better for the planet.
He told The Times, “Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world’s resources. A vegetarian diet is better.”
However, the Cranfield study found that the environmental benefits of vegetarianism depended heavily on the type of food consumed as an alternative to meat.
“A switch from beef and milk to highly refined livestock product analogues such as tofu could actually increase the quantity of arable land needed to supply the UK,” it said.
A significant increase in vegetarianism in Britain could cause the collapse of the country’s livestock industry and result in production of meat shifting overseas to countries with few regulations to protect forests and other uncultivated land, it added.
According to Donal Murphy-Bokern, one of the study authors, “For some people, tofu and other meat substitutes symbolise environmental friendliness but they are not necessarily the badge of merit people claim. Simply eating more bread, pasta and potatoes instead of meat is more environmentally friendly.”
“The figures used in the report are based on a number of questionable assumptions about how vegetarians balance their diet and how the food industry might respond to increased demand,” said Liz O’Neill, spokeswoman for the Vegetarian Society.
“If you’re aiming to reduce your environmental impact by going vegetarian, then it’s obviously not a good idea to rely on highly processed products, but that doesn’t undermine the fact that the livestock industry causes enormous damage and that moving towards a plant-based diet is good for animals, human health and the environment,” she added. (ANI)
- Eat meat, save the planet: Former Brit Vegan - Sep 20, 2010
- Lab-grown meat would cut emissions: Study - Jun 20, 2011
- Eat less meat to tackle climate change: UN panel - Jun 03, 2010
- At last a veg cutlet that tastes, feels like meat - Mar 07, 2012
- Michele's love for vegan lasagne - Aug 21, 2011
- Amrita Rao, a proud vegetarian - Jul 14, 2011
- Slashing meat intake vital for curbing emissions - Apr 16, 2012
- Move over milk, silk, leather - the Indian vegan's here! - Sep 19, 2010
- Dutch scientist to make cultured meat in lab - Nov 17, 2011
- Sticking to a vegetarian diet may be good for kidney disease patients - Dec 24, 2010
- Europe's oldest vegetarian restaurant on culinary crusade (With Images) - Aug 05, 2011
- Dog inspires Adele to turn veggie - Jul 06, 2011
- People may have to go vegetarian to save Earth - Oct 27, 2009
- Veg portions could replace animal products - Jan 04, 2011
- Vegan lifestyle 'ups risk of heart attack, stroke' - Apr 07, 2011
Tags: analogues, arable land, brentford, chickpeas, climate change, donal murphy, eating meat, environmental benefits, environmental friendliness, greenhouse gases, intensive production, lentils, livestock farmers, livestock industry, london feb, meat substitutes, study authors, uncultivated land, uproar, vegetarian diet