Ethanol production could jeopardize soil productivityJune 3rd, 2009 - 4:18 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, June 3 (ANI): In a new research, scientists have suggested that using crop residues as a low cost and readily available source for ethanol production, may mean jeopardizing the long-term productivity of prairie soils.
Crop residues are viewed as a low cost and readily available source of material since more than 50 percent of crop production is residues.
However, crop residues should not be considered simply a waste or benign material. They possess a critical role in sustaining soil organic matter.
Consequently, extensive removal of crop residues for ethanol production, or for other industrial purposes, may impact the long-term productivity of soils.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada scientists at the Indian Head Research Farm in Indian Head and the Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre in Swift Current, all located in Saskatchewan (SK), measured the impact of straw removal after 50 years on soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil organic nitrogen (SON) using the Indian Head Long-Term Rotations established in 1958.
These rotations included a series of fallow-spring wheat-spring wheat crop sequences where straw was removed through baling on selected plots.
In this study, straw removal with baling occurred 2 years out of 3, or 66 percent of the time. The study was converted to no-till in 1991.
Another 4-year study was conducted to quantify how much wheat straw is actually removed through baling when different harvesting systems are used.
The three harvesting/straw removal systems involved (1) swathing-harvesting-baling, (2) straight harvesting-baling, and (3) harvesting with a stripper header-swathing-baling.
Results from these studies were published in the May-June 2009 issue of Agronomy Journal, “Quantifying Straw Removal through Baling and Measuring the Long-Term Impact on Soil Quality and Wheat Production,” by G.P. Lafond and others.
According to Lafond, who was the study leader, “The results would support the recommendation that some straw could be removed from fields providing that the frequency of removal was less than 66 percent and that no more than 40 percent of the aboveground residues other than grain are removed.”
“From a crop management perspective, proper nitrogen fertility combined with no-till would further reduce the possibility of net losses in SOC and SON,” he said. (ANI)
- Scientists say growing grain for food, not fuel, more energy efficient - Apr 20, 2010
- New tillage practice cuts greenhouse emissions, ups farm yields - Jan 14, 2011
- Plant and forestry waste might replace a third of gasoline use by 2030 - Feb 11, 2009
- Bihar farmer sets organic wheat production record - Apr 12, 2012
- Strategy outlined for growing bioenergy while protecting wildlife - Oct 01, 2009
- 13 face prosecution for burning agri-residue in Haryana - Jan 14, 2011
- More corn for biofuels would contaminate water with fertilizers and pesticides - Sep 29, 2009
- Nanomaterials contaminating soil, food crops? - Aug 22, 2012
- Ants, termites have positive impact on crop yields in dryland agriculture - Apr 03, 2011
- Scientists create salt-tolerant wheat - Mar 12, 2012
- Replacing corn with perennial grasses has beneficial effect on soil carbon - Dec 03, 2008
- Scientists achieve breakthrough in bioethanol production from agricultural waste - Nov 22, 2009
- Trees, grass can be used to generate renewable energy - Jan 27, 2010
- Efficient nitrogen management results in more cow milk production - May 29, 2010
- Reject watermelon juice can be valuable source of biofuel - Aug 26, 2009
Tags: agri food canada, agricultural research centre, agronomy journal, crop residues, crop sequences, ethanol production, harvesting systems, industrial purposes, lafond, organic nitrogen, prairie soils, research scientists, soil productivity, soil quality, spring wheat crop, stripper header, study leader, term productivity, wheat production, wheat straw