Don’t bank on ‘wisdom of crowds’ to win bets in football matches
November 16th, 2010 - 4:17 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Nov 16 (ANI): A new study questions whether it’s a good idea to follow ‘the “wisdom of crowds’ while betting on, say, a team’s win in a football match.
Point spreads-the number of points by which a strong team can be expected to defeat a weaker team-are supposed to reflect the ‘wisdom of crowds’ - but the new study has claimed that crowds don’t have a clue.
“Point spread betting markets seem to offer an important example of crowd wisdom, because point spreads are very accurate and are widely believed to reflect the ‘crowd’s’ prediction of upcoming sporting events,” said authors Joseph P. Simmons (Yale University), Leif D. Nelson (University of California at Berkeley), Jeff Galak (Carnegie Mellon University), and Shane Frederick (Yale University).
The authors conducted a season-long investigation of the betting habits of enthusiastic NFL football fans from diverse regions of the United States.
Participants wagered more than 20,000 dollars on football games against point spreads that were manipulated to favour the underdog.
The bettors failed the test, predicting vastly more favourites (89 percent) than underdogs. And even when bettors were warned that the spreads had been increased they still predicted favourites only slightly less often (83 percent).
“In this context, the temptation to rely on one’s intuition is so strong as to lead people to rely on what they intuitively feel to be true (this favourite will prevail against the spread) rather than on what they generally know to be true (the favourite will usually lose against the spread)” the authors wrote.
Interestingly, people have trouble learning from their mistakes: the crowd’s predictions worsened over time, rather than getting better.
Finally, the researchers hit upon a method of eliciting better choices.
“Asking people to predict point differentials rather than make choices against point spreads decreased reliance on faulty intuitions and produced vastly different, and vastly wiser, predictions against the spread,” the authors conclude.
The study is published in the Journal of Consumer Research. (ANI)
- Betting in full flow on whether Woods will hit a tree or kiss a blonde at Masters - Mar 31, 2010
- Bad things seem even worse if people expect them to happen again soon - Feb 08, 2011
- Shah Rukh Khan charms Yale crowd (With Images) - Apr 13, 2012
- Our gut feelings can cut both ways - good or bad - Jan 05, 2011
- Watching commercials leads to greater enjoyment of TV programs - Feb 24, 2009
- Kazakh bookmakers furious with Octopus Paul for their low profits - Jul 20, 2010
- Model to predict volcanic eruptions - Feb 24, 2011
- Infant brains are primed with 'intuitive physics' - Jan 25, 2012
- Repeating bad experience makes it seem worse - Feb 08, 2011
- Indo-Pak World Cup semi-final clash "match of the century": Sarfraz Nawaz - Mar 29, 2011
- Yale University brings Hindi debating to America - Mar 29, 2012
- Focus on your body to appreciate it - Mar 30, 2011
- Why using e-book makes your memory dull - Jan 16, 2011
- Virginia Tech Football Looses Season Opening Game Once Again - Sep 07, 2010
- Model to help predict volcanic eruptions - Feb 24, 2011
Tags: bettors, california at berkeley, carnegie mellon university, differentials, football fans, football games, football match, galak, intuition, intuitions, match point, nfl football, regions of the united states, sporting events, study questions, underdog, underdogs, university of california at berkeley, wisdom of crowds, yale university