Dogs may have not become “man’s best friend” in East Asia
August 4th, 2009 - 12:31 pm ICT by ANI
Washington, August 4 (ANI): In a new DNA study, scientists have found that domestic dogs originated from Eurasian gray wolves sometime between 15,000 and 40,000 years ago, which raises doubt on the theory that dogs became “man’s best friend” in East Asia.
In 2002, researchers had examined DNA from hundreds of dogs around the world and found that East Asian dogs are the most genetically diverse.
Since the highest diversity should exist in the region where dogs first went from wolf to woof, the study seemed to suggest that the dog-human bond was forged in East Asia.
That study included almost equal numbers of East Asian “breed” dogs and “village” dogs, according to study co-author Adam Boyko, a biologist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.
Breed dogs include purebred and mixed-breed animals.
Village dogs are those that are indigenous to a specific region and “were not subject to the same degree of intense artificial selection and closed breeding practices that characterize modern breed dogs,” said the study authors.
According to a report in National Geographic News, for the new survey, Boyko and colleagues examined DNA from village and breed dogs living across Africa, plus Puerto Rican street dogs and mixed-breed dogs in the US.
The team found that the African village dogs’ genetic diversity matches that of East Asian village dogs.
The authors note that this does not mean domestic dogs might have originated in Africa.
“We know Africa cannot be where dogs were domesticated, because there are no gray wolves there,” Boyko said.
But, the findings call into question the previous proof that dogs were first domesticated in East Asia.
“What we think we are picking up on is actually the signal of village dogs have more genetic diversity than breed dogs do,” said Boyko.
That’s not to say East Asia is out of the running.
But to definitively solve the riddle, scientists should obtain genetic samples from village dogs throughout Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, according to Boyko.
Once the timing and location of domestication is resolved, doggie DNA could help unravel mysteries about early human-migration patterns and population histories, he added.
For example, he noted, “there’s pretty good evidence that they followed humans into the New World, and they certainly followed along the Polynesians in their exploring.” (ANI)
- African village dogs genetically much more diverse than modern breeds - Aug 05, 2009
- Dogs were tamed 16,300 years ago in China as livestock, not pets - Sep 05, 2009
- Australian native dog came from China? - Sep 09, 2011
- Genetic study sheds light on how humans colonised the Pacific - Feb 04, 2011
- Asians share a common ancestry - Dec 11, 2009
- Why Obama's pet pooch has curly hair - Aug 28, 2009
- Small dogs originated in the Middle East: Study - Mar 15, 2010
- Small dogs may have originated in the Middle East 12,000 yrs ago - Feb 24, 2010
- Evolutionary mis-step created short-legged dogs - Jul 17, 2009
- Wolves beat dogs when it comes to logic - Sep 05, 2009
- Dogs' human-like social skills make them man's best friend - Feb 19, 2011
- Dogs have turned dumb due to years of domestication: Study - Jun 09, 2010
- Why dachshunds, corgis have stubby legs - Jul 17, 2009
- Africa has two, not one, species of elephant - Dec 22, 2010
- Racehorses came from Europe, not Arabia - Oct 06, 2010
Tags: artificial selection, asian village, august 4, breed animals, cornell university, dna study, domestic dogs, east asia, genetic diversity, genetic samples, gray wolves, human bond, ithaca new york, mixed breed dogs, national geographic news, new survey, puerto rican, street dogs, study authors, village dogs