Consumers face inner conflict when it comes to making decisions
November 18th, 2009 - 2:16 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )
Washington, Nov 18 (ANI): From buying a piece of brownie to deciding on a new home, consumers are always involved in an inner dialogue that reflects thoughts and perspectives of their different selves, according to the authors of a new study
For the study, Shalini Bahl (iAM Business Consulting) and George R. Milne (University of Massachusetts) studied the multiple perspectives that exist within consumers and explored the ways they navigate inconsistent preferences to make consumption decisions.
They combined in-depth interviews, multi-dimensional scaling, and metaphors to identify some of the voices that engage consumers’ minds.
In addition, the researchers used “dialogic self theory,” which differentiates between the “Meta-self” and multiple selves.
They said that multiple selves have unique perspectives and speak from different positions with relatively independent voices, while the Meta-self reflects a distanced neutral perspective.
“In our analysis of relationships between two selves with different worldviews and consumption preferences, we discovered a unique relationship in which one self offers a non-judgmental acceptance of another self’s opposing views and behaviour, and in doing so brings peace and equanimity in a situation involving opposing preferences,” wrote the authors.
At other times, one self will take over and dominate, which can lead to inner conflict.
One finding exposed a “desirable self,” which can promote positive consumption behaviours like exercise and hard work.
However, when allowed free reign, this self can push consumers to overstretch their limits and end up with physical injuries or burnout.
The authors believe that the study could help marketers and other agencies that are trying to promote more mindful consumption choices.
“By understanding the different voices in consumers they can promote communications that model consumers’ inner conflicts and present different dialogical strategies like negotiation, coalition, compassion, and compartmentalization that will help them navigate conflicts to make better choices,” said the authors.
The study is published in the Journal of Consumer Research. (ANI)
- Inability to imagine future prevents us from saving up in the present: Study - Dec 23, 2010
- Mindfulness is the best antidote to stress - Nov 01, 2011
- Identifying with car prompts aggressive driving - Oct 18, 2011
- Inner voice helps us exercise self-control - Sep 22, 2010
- Romantic break-ups whittle down sense of identity - Mar 09, 2010
- Happy people go for candies - Apr 20, 2011
- Pride in achievement makes consumers choose French fries over salad - Nov 16, 2010
- Hopeful consumers make healthier choices than happy ones - Apr 20, 2011
- Women more likely to self-medicate than men - Apr 16, 2011
- Romantic break-up shatters a person's self-concept - Mar 09, 2010
- Talking to yourself is good, say scientists - Sep 24, 2010
- Self-affirmation helps you excel in sports - May 26, 2011
- Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation may not be best option - Dec 26, 2010
- Why good guys aren't preferred as tough leaders - Sep 28, 2011
- Hot red pepper can help burn unwanted calories - Apr 26, 2011
Tags: bahl, behaviours, brownie, consumption choices, consumption decisions, depth interviews, different voices, equanimity, free reign, george r milne, home consumers, independent voices, inner conflict, inner conflicts, inner dialogue, neutral perspective, opposing views, physical injuries, university of massachusetts, worldviews