Consumer Reports’ Releases Its Catalog Of Dangerous Supplements

August 4th, 2010 - 8:13 pm ICT by Pen Men At Work  

danger August 4, 2010 (Pen Men at Work): ‘Consumer Reports’ happens to be an American magazine that is published every month by the Consumers Union. The magazine prints appraisals and contrasts of consumer goods and services. Its appraisals are anchored in treatment and consequences from its internal testing laboratory. The magazine also prints all-purpose buying guides. ‘Consumer Reports’ is in possession of virtually 7.3 million subscribers. It possesses twelve-monthly testing finances of just about US$21 million.

This magazine discharged the findings of its report on Tuesday. The magazine has mentioned that merely one-third of more than 54,000 dietetic supplements on the record have been corroborated as secure by scientific testing. The report deemed that numerous supplements consisted of dangerous ingredients that may engender health crises such as cancer, cardiovascular ills, liver destruction or harm to the kidney.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of America possesses no authority to standardize these supplements. Therefore, they continue to be on the shelves of stores.

Extremely dangerous supplements, in keeping with Consumer Reports, were aconite, bitter orange, chaparral and colloidal silver. Also in the catalog of harmful supplements were coltsfoot, comfrey, country mallow and germanium. The list of perilous supplements also consists of greater celandine, kava, lobelia and yohimbe.

The report of this leading magazine also advocated the American Congress to accelerate the small steps in the direction of providing the FDA more power, particularly, to police the supplements. Regardless of the ‘natural’ tags possessed by countless supplements, many are infected. Still, the magazine has asserted that Americans congregate to obtain the supplements. The magazine referred to the Nutrition Business Journal as articulating that the American marketplace was worth a sizable $26.7 billion in 2009.

Consumer Reports has also voiced in its report that the FDA has not policed any supplement plants in China. This is despite the fact that the FDA had instituted field offices there in 2008 itself.

Consumer Reports is in opposition to the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. This act has been labeled by Consumer Reports as being excessively loaded in favor of the industry. This act thwarts the FDA from policing supplements in the same manner as it controls prescription pills.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Health, Health Science |

Subscribe