Conservation targets too small to stop extinction
October 14th, 2009 - 1:53 pm ICT by ANI ( Leave a comment )Washington, October 14 (ANI): A new study indicates that conservation biologists are setting their minimum population size targets too low to prevent extinction.
The study, by University of Adelaide and Macquarie University scientists, has shown that populations of endangered species are unlikely to persist in the face of global climate change and habitat loss unless they number around 5000 mature individuals or more.
“Conservation biologists routinely underestimate or ignore the number of animals or plants required to prevent extinction,” said lead author Dr Lochran Traill, from the University of Adelaide’s Environment Institute.
“Often, they aim to maintain tens or hundreds of individuals, when thousands are actually needed. Our review found that populations smaller than about 5000 had unacceptably high extinction rates. This suggests that many targets for conservation recovery are simply too small to do much good in the long run,” he added.
A long-standing idea in species restoration programs is the so-called ‘50/500′ rule.
This states that at least 50 adults are required to avoid the damaging effects of inbreeding, and 500 to avoid extinctions due to the inability to evolve to cope with environmental change.
“Our research suggests that the 50/500 rule is at least an order of magnitude too small to effectively stave off extinction,” said Dr Traill.
“This does not necessarily imply that populations smaller than 5000 are doomed. But it does highlight the challenge that small populations face in adapting to a rapidly changing world,” he added.
According to team member Professor Richard Frankham, from Macquarie University’s Department of Biological Sciences, “Genetic diversity within populations allows them to evolve to cope with environmental change, and genetic loss equates to fragility in the face of such changes.”
Conservation biologists worldwide are battling to prevent a mass extinction event in the face of a growing human population and its associated impact on the planet.
“The conservation management bar needs to be a lot higher,” said Dr Traill. (ANI)
- Is Earth already on the brink of 6th mass extinction? - Mar 03, 2011
- 24 mn generations for mice to grow to elephant size - Jan 31, 2012
- A fifth of world's life at extinction risk - Oct 27, 2010
- Disease wiping out amphibians in Panama before they can be identified - Jul 20, 2010
- DNA helps curb illegal logging of rainforests - Jul 04, 2011
- Bison bones show adaptability to climate change - Feb 01, 2012
- Sociable wasps better at beating diseases - Jul 12, 2011
- One species becomes extinct every fortnight in England - Oct 05, 2010
- Moving species could save them, says expert - Mar 18, 2011
- New insight into horse evolution - Dec 11, 2009
- Isolation of Great Barrier Reef could lead to extinction of marine life - Jul 07, 2010
- Taking help of math to predict, prevent future extinctions - Jan 26, 2011
- Climate change caused mass extinction of mammals 50,000 years ago - May 19, 2010
- Seals quickly respond to gain and loss of habitat under climate change - Jul 10, 2009
- Humans driving extinction faster than new species can evolve - Mar 08, 2010
Tags: conservation biologists, effects of inbreeding, environmental change, extinction rates, genetic diversity, genetic loss, global climate change, habitat loss, macquarie university, mass extinction event, mature individuals, minimum population, order of magnitude, population size, professor richard, restoration programs, richard frankham, species restoration, university of adelaide, university scientists