Chromium has no nutritional effect: Study
November 28th, 2010 - 3:12 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Nov 28 (ANI): A new research has stated that Chromium III, which is considered as an essential component of healthy diet, has no nutritional benefits.
A paper authored by University of Alabama strongly indicated that chromium, which the National Academies of Sciences accepted as an essential element in 1980, doesn’t have any nutritional value.
“This means that the status of chromium in numerous nutrition and related textbooks and in the dietary guidelines of the national academies and USDA (and similar agencies) will need to be rewritten,” said John Vincent, professor of chemistry at UA and a co-author of the study.
He conducted the study along with Jane Rasco, assistant professor of biological sciences at UA.
For study the researchers fed one group of rats a purified diet containing as little chromium (III) as practically possible for six months while closely monitoring the rat’s health through various measurements including blood tests.
In other rats, the researchers added varying amounts of chromium to the rats’ diets while monitoring their health.
“The diet that had as little chromium (III) as we could put in it and the diet that had an amount corresponding to a human taking a standard nutritional supplement with chromium had no effect on the rats. They had the same body mass, they ate the same amount of food, and they were able to metabolize glucose exactly the same. There were no differences in the health of the rats,” noted Vincent.
“Together with the results of other recent studies, these results clearly indicate that chromium can no longer be considered an essential element,” the researchers wrote in their paper’s abstract.
While the research showed chromium to have no nutritional benefit, Vincent said it did show in the rats the potential to have a therapeutic effect on diabetes when consumed in large doses.
Vincent referred to the sale of chromium nutritional supplements, such as chromium picolinate, as ‘misguided,’ based on current research, although further research into effects on diabetics could alter the situation, he said.
The research is publishing in the upcoming issue of Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry. (ANI)
- Chromium picolinate may reduce inflammation in diabetic nephropathy - Sep 23, 2010
- Plant oil may be a key in the fight against obesity - Mar 24, 2011
- Scientists track mercury poisoning risk from diets - Nov 21, 2011
- Popular supplements don't help in weight loss - Jul 14, 2010
- Scientists uncover 'dark side' of beta-carotene - May 03, 2012
- Slimming before pregnancy ensures healthier births - Apr 15, 2012
- Folic acid supplements contribute to breast cancer risk: Study - Feb 12, 2011
- Almonds may help reduce risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease - Dec 17, 2010
- Eggs 'contain higher Vitamin D levels and low cholesterol than thought' - Apr 14, 2011
- Chokeberry extract 'regulates weight gain' - Apr 26, 2010
- Scientists raise concerns about 'healthful' plant-based antioxidants' safety - Oct 28, 2010
- A daily dose of safflower oil may help reduce heart disease risk - Mar 22, 2011
- Chokeberry extract regulates weight gain - Apr 26, 2010
- Eggs shedding cholesterol: US study - Feb 09, 2011
- Extra selenium can spur type-2 diabetes risk - Mar 01, 2012
Tags: assistant professor, biological sciences, blood tests, body mass, chromium picolinate, co author, dietary guidelines, diets, glucose, healthy diet, john vincent, national academies, nutritional benefit, nutritional supplement, nutritional supplements, nutritional value, rasco, rats, therapeutic effect, university of alabama