Chinese ‘herbal’ ciggies as unhealthy as regular ones
December 4th, 2009 - 2:20 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Dec 4 (ANI): A new American study has found that smoking Chinese “herbal” cigarettes, which contain a mix of tobacco and medicinal herbs, is just as unhealthy as regular cigarettes.
A team of researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, led by Stanton A. Glantz, professor of medicine in the Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute and scientists at the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, analysed the levels of four markers to establish differences in nicotine and carcinogen delivery between the two type of cigarettes.
The research was carried out in a Chinese city where 135 smokers of herbal cigarettes were compared to 143 people who took “regular” tobacco cigarettes.
The examination of the urine samples and evaluating questionnaires showed no major difference in the levels of all four markers: cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (two markers of nicotine intake); and total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-butanol and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (two classes of carcinogens).
Glantz said: “Levels of carcinogens were correlated with measures of nicotine intake, meaning that the more nicotine smokers took in, the higher the levels of carcinogens they took in.”
Moreover, 47percent of the volunteers had only switched to herbal cigarettes due to their “better taste;” 24percent switched owing to their health concerns and the belief that herbal cigarettes were healthier than regular ones. In fact, those smoking herbal cigarettes smoked more cigarettes in a day.
“Adding herbs to the cigarettes would not be expected to affect the nicotine, which is the addictive drug in tobacco, and cancer-causing chemicals in the smoke of cigarettes…The Chinese tobacco industry should avoid misleading the public when promoting herbal cigarettes as ’safer’ products,” Glantz said.
He added: “The public needs to be aware that herbal cigarettes do not deliver fewer carcinogens…We hope our findings will help to dispel the myth that they are a safer alternative to conventional cigarettes; they are not.”
The findings of the study have appeared in the December issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. (ANI)
Related Stories
- Chinese 'herbal' cigarettes no safer than regular ones - Dec 04, 2009
- Smoking tobacco through waterpipe as harmful as puffing on cigarette - Dec 03, 2009
- Need for evaluation and regulation of 'electronic cigarettes', say experts - Feb 11, 2010
- Even third-hand smoke can pose cancer risk - Feb 09, 2010
- Secondhand smoke adds to health risk for smokers - Jan 29, 2010
- Moist snuff high in carcinogenic content - Dec 03, 2009
- Electric Cigarettes Not A Safe Alternative - Jul 29, 2009
- Smoking early in the morning 'ups lung cancer risk' - Dec 04, 2009
- Nicotine rises "gradually" in the brain - Mar 09, 2010
- Smokeless tobacco can be as dangerous as cigarettes - Aug 17, 2009
- Scientists now reveal dangers of third-hand smoke - Feb 09, 2010
- Cigarette ads can fuel teens' smoking desires - Mar 03, 2010
- Snuffing tobacco more dangerous than puffing - Aug 17, 2009
- E-cigarettes 'do more harm than good' - Jan 21, 2010
- Just one cigarette can harm arteries - Nov 03, 2009
- addictive drug
- california san francisco
- cancer causing chemicals
- cardiovascular research institute
- center for disease control
- center for disease control and prevention
- china center
- chinese city
- chinese tobacco
- cotinine
- disease control and prevention
- herbal cigarettes
- medicinal herbs
- nicotine intake
- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- safer products
- tobacco and cancer
- tobacco cigarettes
- tobacco industry
- university of california san francisco
Posted in Health Science, |







