Calorie labelling has no effect on food purchases: Study
February 16th, 2011 - 3:46 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Feb 16 (ANI): A new study has challenged the idea that calorie labelling has an effect on the purchasing behaviour of teenagers or what parents purchase for their children.
Brian Elbel, assistant professor at the New York University School of Medicine, and his team compared receipts and surveys from 427 parents and teenagers at fast-food restaurants before and after mandatory labelling began in July 2008.
They focused on lower income communities in New York City and then compared how much it changed eating habits compared with similar outlets nearby in New Jersey that did not have to label their food.Data was collected before labelling began, and one month after labelling laws went into effect.
Before labelling began, none of the teens in the study noticed calorie information in the restaurant. However, 57 percent in New York and 18 percent in Newark noticed the calorie information after labelling began.
According to the findings, 9 percent said the information influenced their choices, and all of the teens used the information to purchase fewer calories. Twenty-eight percent of adults said the labelling influenced their choice.
The study did not find a change in the number of calories purchased at fast-food restaurants after labelling went into effect.
Teens purchased about 725 calories and parents purchased about 600 calories for their children.
The way food tastes was considered the most important reason that teens bought it, while price was a consideration for slightly over 50 percent.
Just over a quarter of the group said that they often or always limited the amount of food they ate in an effort to control their weight.
The study also reported that most teenagers underestimated the amount of calories they had purchased, some by up to 466 calories.
Easy access and the convenience of restaurant locations were the greatest drivers for teens and then taste influenced where they chose to eat.
“It is important to understand that labelling is not likely to be enough to influence obesity in a large scale way. Other public policy approaches, as well as the efforts of food companies as other actors, will be needed,” said Elbel.
The study is published in the current issue of the International Journal of Obesity Advance Online Publication. (ANI)
- Study: Calorie labels don't affect kids food choices - Feb 16, 2011
- Addicts cut down on junk food after calorie labelling - Jul 27, 2011
- Collectible toys could foster healthy food choices - Sep 25, 2011
- Don't judge a food by its organic label - Apr 11, 2011
- Hardee's shapes up turkey burger - Mar 22, 2011
- Teens growing addicted to junk food - Jul 29, 2011
- How chefs can help combat obesity by creating reduced-calorie meals - Nov 06, 2010
- Fast-food ads prompt kids to pile on pounds - Apr 29, 2012
- New weight-loss mantra for teens: ditch the diet shakes and bars - Dec 21, 2010
- Fathers,not mothers, influence what children eat - Jun 10, 2011
- Kids know which brands deliver what they want: salt, sugar and fat - Jan 26, 2011
- High-sugar diets in teens 'increase heart disease risk later in life' - Jan 11, 2011
- 'Menus should have data on calories, nutrition' - Apr 01, 2009
- Heart Attack Grill Restaurant gives free food to obese people - Nov 12, 2010
- US wants restaurants to show calorie content on menus - Apr 03, 2011
Tags: amount of calories, assistant professor, convenience, easy access, eating habits, elbel, fast food restaurants, fewer calories, food data, food purchases, food tastes, income communities, labelling laws, new york city, new york university, new york university school of medicine, newark, receipts, school of medicine, teenagers