Blocking sun by placing mirrors in the sky not a feasible warming solution
July 8th, 2008 - 2:07 pm ICT by ANI - Send to a friend:Washington, July 8 (ANI): A new study has determined that a proposal to reverse climate change by placing mirrors in the sky to reflect sunlight away from Earth would not be a feasible warming solution.
According to a report in Discovery News, this solution would not give us back the same climate we had before we started emitting so much carbon dioxide (CO2).
The study, carried out by researchers at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom, involved the application of state-of-the-art global climate models to predict the effect of using reflective sunshades to send a fraction of the sunlight that enters Earths atmosphere back into space before it can heat things up.
They compared two futures with four times the pre-industrial level of CO2: one where nothing was done, and another where the sunlight intensity was reduced to a level that achieved the lower, pre-industrial global average temperature, despite the higher CO2 levels.
The second case simulated the use of enough sunshades to drop the average temperature to pre-industrial levels, which turned out to be a reduction in sunlight of about 4.2 percent.
Although we managed to cancel out warming on a global average, what you end up with is some areas that warm up and some that cool down, said Dan Lunt, who led the study.
We found warming in the Arctic and Antarctic regions, and a cooling in the equatorial regions, said Lunt. We got a decrease in rainfall a lot of places in the world, decreases in sea ice, and some changes in the El Nino phenomenon, he added.
These changes resulted because the mirrors reduce sunlight more at the equators than near the poles, while CO2 has a warming effect that more equally distributed, according to Lunt.
The sunshades also do nothing to prevent changes caused by increased CO2, such as ocean acidification or changes to plant growth.
According to climatologist Alan Robock of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J., he biggest problem I have with geoengineering discussions now is that the prospect of it working will reduce efforts to mitigate the problem by reducing fossil fuel emissions.
Te solution to the climate problem is mitigation, not geoengineering. These things are not perfect and there the potential for unintended consequences, he added. (ANI)
Related Stories
- Super-hairy plants may help fight global warming - January 10, 2008
- Indian origin scientist says geoengineering could slow down global water cycle - May 28, 2008
- Artificial engineering may save the Earth from global warming - September 1, 2008
- Global warming is twice as fatal as previously believed - February 28, 2008
- Global warming to imperil tropical species - May 6, 2008
- Theres still time to save the planet, say scientists - October 8, 2008
- Urgently required: Climate emergency back-up plan - November 8, 2008
- World needs emergency backup plan to stabilize climate - November 8, 2008
- World needs emergency backup plan to stabilize climate (Re-Issue) - November 9, 2008
- Global warming mitigation strategy would have adverse impact on ozone layer - April 25, 2008
- 2007 shares record of being Earth’s second warmest year with 1998 - January 17, 2008
- Cars contribute most to global warming, while ships have cooling effect - January 28, 2008
- APs global warming report called irrational hysteria by scientists - December 18, 2008
- American west is new global hot spot - March 30, 2008
- Climate change will destroy many penguin colonies: WWF report - October 13, 2008
- antarctic regions
- average temperature
- carbon dioxide
- climate change
- climatologist
- co2 levels
- discovery news
- el nino phenomenon
- global climate models
- lunt
- new brunswick
- ocean acidification
- places in the world
- plant growth
- rainfall
- rutgers university
- sea ice
- sunlight intensity
- sunshades
- university of bristol
Posted in Health Science, |

