Apex court to decide if act covers Hindu marriage abroad
August 2nd, 2010 - 11:30 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Aug 2 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday issued notice to the estranged wife of a petitioner who has sought the court’s ruling on whether the Hindu Marriage Act applies to an American citizen of Indian origin for dissolution of a marriage solemnised abroad according to Hindu rituals.
There is no direct judgment of this court on this aspect, said a bench of Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S.Chauhan when senior counsel K.K.Mani, appearing for petitioner R. Sridharan, drew the court’s attention on this blank aspect on the applicability of the Hindu Marriage Act.
The court also stayed the proceedings before the family court in Chennai initiated by Tamil cine actress R. Sukanya seeking divorce from Sridharan, a American citizen of Indian origin.
Sridharan had challenged the Madras High Court order that had held that the principal family court had the jurisdiction of hearing divorce case filed by the cine actress, contending that the Hindu Marriage Act clearly states that it extends to the whole of India except for Jammu and Kashmir.
He said that going by the jurisdiction of the Hindu Marriage Act, it could not be applicable to the citizens of America.
The petitioner said that it was settled in law that in order to apply the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, both the parties must be domiciled in India, not only one of them.
Sridharan and Sukanya were married in Balaji Temple in New Jersey. Their marriage was registered on July 30, 2002 with the marriage officer in United States and thus the provisions of the Foreign Marriage Act would only apply, the petitioner contended.
Sukanya left for India on Jan 14, 2003 on the pre-text of doing a programme in a private TV channel. Thereafter she never returned. On July 8 that year, Sridharan served her a notice asking Sukanya to return to her matrimonial home.
On March 3, 2004, Sukanya moved the family court in Chennai seeking the dissolution of marriage.
On July 17 that year, she got ex parte decree of divorce and thereafter started prolonged legal battle culminating in the judgment of the Madras High Court, which Sridharan is now challenging.
- Indian-American questions marriage act in court - Jul 21, 2010
- Muslim man told to pay maintenance to ex-wife - Jun 18, 2011
- Custody disputes: Call for India to sign Hague Convention - May 27, 2011
- Second appeal under Hindu Marriage Act allowed, rules court - Oct 08, 2010
- 2G: Apex court to hear government's plea April 13 - Apr 05, 2012
- Divorced parents protest in Pakistan city - Mar 06, 2011
- Tripura woman sent to jail for torturing husband - Aug 08, 2011
- Supreme Court summons Shinde's daughter, estranged husband - Jul 08, 2010
- Order banning SPOs only for Chhatisgarh, says apex court - Nov 18, 2011
- Central varsities' OBC quota petition to be heard Monday (Lead) - Jul 01, 2011
- Court rejects plea against tax on marriage marquees (Lead) - Sep 30, 2011
- Court stays information panel's order to RBI on RTI plea - Dec 09, 2011
- High court reserves order on summoning Modi before Nanavati panel - Apr 22, 2011
- More transparency can bring down RTI pleas: Apex court - Aug 16, 2011
- 25 percent seats for poor under education act upheld (Second Lead) - Apr 12, 2012
Tags: american citizen, apex court, aug 2, chennai, cine actress, dissolution of marriage, divorce case, hindu marriage act, hindu rituals, indian origin, jammu, madras high court, marriage officer, matrimonial home, petitioner, principal family, private tv channel, senior counsel, sridharan, sukanya