A man’s stare causes women to score low on math!
January 30th, 2011 - 11:25 am ICT by ANIWashington, Jan 30 (ANI): A new study claims that getting stared at by a man causes a woman to score low in math problems.
“It creates this vicious cycle for women in which they’re underperforming in math or work domains, but they’re continuing to want to interact with the person who is making them underperform in the first place,” Live Science quoted Sarah Gervais, a psychologist at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, as saying.
According to researchers, objectification happens when a person is judged on body parts or sexual function without regard to other aspects of their personality.
Gervais and her colleagues decided to investigate whether “sneaking a peek” at an opposite-sex workmate might affect that person’s job performance.
“For people that are doing this - even the men who are presumably doing this pretty frequently - actually having to slow down and do it is pretty hard,” Gervais said.
The results revealed that men’s scores were not affected whether or not they got an objectifying glance from a woman before the math test.
But it wasn’t the same case for women.
Women whose male partners objectified them scored lower than those whose partners didn’t gaze at their bodies. The non-objectified women scored an average of 6 out of 12 questions correct, while objectified women scored an average of just under 5.
The researchers are now investigating whether woman-on-woman or man-on-man gazing has any effect on performance. They’re also interested in whether licentious glances could become as taboo as butt-slaps under sexual harassment law.
“When it comes to something subtle like this, it’s very difficult to combat. It’s sort of expected that men are going to do this to women and that really it’s just not that harmful,” she said.
“Even though it is just a look,” she added, “it has meaningful consequences for women.”
The study appears in the February issue of the journal Psychology of Women Quarterly. (ANI)
- Women find men with smouldering eyes 'shifty' - May 13, 2012
- Focusing on your partner's looks can ruin your romantic relationship - Apr 09, 2011
- Are you cued into your sex appeal for success in dating? - May 29, 2011
- Why it's ok for women to cry when sad, but a stigma for men - Mar 03, 2011
- Women stay away from math out of their own free choice - Oct 27, 2010
- Why speed dating may not work - Mar 02, 2011
- Men likelier to commit faster than women: Survey - Feb 04, 2011
- Why you shouldn't trust someone who scratches his or her nose! - Feb 19, 2011
- Why is the trend of 'flexisexuality' catching up? - Feb 24, 2011
- The science behind beautiful faces revealed - Dec 22, 2010
- 'People see bold pictures of women as objects' - May 16, 2012
- Our brains can't handle too much love interest - Apr 16, 2010
- Singles go for hotties when given too many dating options - Apr 25, 2010
- 'Persistence pays in wooing women' - Dec 15, 2011
- Kunis, Portman did not drink before shoot - Nov 15, 2010
Tags: body parts, butt, colleagues, gaze, live science, male partners, man on man, math problems, math test, objectification, peek, psychologist, psychology of women, sexual function, sexual harassment law, taboo, university of nebraska, university of nebraska lincoln, vicious cycle, women women