2007 Gamma ray burst did not originate from neutron stars or black holes in Andromeda Galaxy
January 5th, 2008 - 12:23 pm ICT by admin ( 1 comment )Washington, Jan 5 (ANI): New observations from physicists have led to the conclusion that intense burst of gamma rays possibly coming from the Andromeda Galaxy in February 2007 lacked a gravitational wave, which rules out an initial interpretation that the burst came from merging neutron stars or black holes within the galaxy.
Gamma ray bursts are among the most violent and energetic events in the universe.
On Feb. 1, 2007, four gamma ray satellites measured a short but intense outburst of energetic gamma rays originating in the direction of the Andromeda galaxy 2.5 million light years from Earth.
The majority of short (less than 2 seconds) gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are thought to come from the merger and coalescence of two massive but compact objects such as neutron stars or black hole systems. They also can come from less-common soft, gamma ray repeaters, which emit fewer intense gamma rays.
The most likely explanation for the burst of gamma rays was initially considered to be the merger of two neutron stars or black holes. Such a monumental cosmic event occurring in a nearby galaxy should have generated gravitational waves that would be easily measured by the ultra-sensitive LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) detectors.
But, the absence of a gravitational wave signal meant the burst could not have originated in this way in the Andromeda Galaxy.
But during February’s blast of gamma rays, the four-kilometer and two-kilometer gravitational wave interferometers at LIGO’s Hanford facility, Washington, were collecting data, but did not detect any associated gravitational waves.
A revised interpretation, presented last month by Isabel Leonor from the University of Oregon (UO), suggests two possible origins: A merger event beyond Andromeda or a burst from an astronomical object known as a soft gamma-ray repeater within Andromeda. The latter, also called a magnetar, involves neutron stars with enormous magnetic fields that occasionally produce big outbursts of gamma rays.
“In general, our understanding of GRBs and soft gamma ray repeaters has increased dramatically in the past decade but is still in an early stage,” said Ray Frey, a professor of physics from UO. “So every piece of the puzzle that is put in place gives the overall picture more clarity,” he added. (ANI)
- Supercomputer solves gamma-ray burst mystery - Apr 08, 2011
- Study predicts occurrence of neutron star collision in local galaxies - Dec 03, 2010
- Gamma-ray bursts powered by strongest magnetic fields in universe - Nov 04, 2010
- Very short gamma-ray bursts linked to evaporation of primordial black holes - Nov 04, 2010
- Crab nebula is slowly dimming: Scientists - Jan 14, 2011
- Subaru Telescope detects clues for dark gamma-ray bursts' origin - Jul 22, 2010
- How black holes fire gas jets into space - Jan 12, 2012
- Physicists discover new way to visualize warped space-time - Apr 12, 2011
- Space observatory briefly blinded by record-breaking x-ray blast - Jul 15, 2010
- Supernova remnant erupts in enormous flares - May 12, 2011
- NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory finds youngest nearby black hole - Nov 16, 2010
- Astronomers find supermassive black holes - Sep 01, 2011
- Very high-energy gamma rays coming from giant black hole, reveals telescopes - Jul 03, 2009
- Awesome power of supermassive black holes revealed - Apr 17, 2010
- 'Smoking gun' of black hole activation found - May 27, 2010
Tags: andromeda galaxy, astronomical object, black holes, compact objects, cosmic event, energetic events, galaxy 2, galaxy washington, gamma ray burst, gamma ray bursts, gamma rays, gravitational wave signal, gravitational waves, initial interpretation, isabel leonor, laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory, merger event, million light years, nearby galaxy, neutron stars
February 21st, 2011 at 9:39 pm
A nearby gamma ray burst and no gravitational waves. Hmmm. Maybe gravitational waves don’t exist. Maybe before we spend zillions on making better detectors (e.g., LISA) we should thoroughly check gravity’s weak field regime. Given a spherical mass with a hole through its center, does a test object oscillate through the hole or not? If not, then we should expect gravitational waves to not exist. This weak field gravity test could be done with a modified Cavendish balance for a tiny fraction of the cost of our oxymoronically named gravitational wave “observatories.”