‘Aerosols can only temporary fix global warming’July 19th, 2010 - 2:32 pm ICT by ANI
London, July 19 (ANI): Injecting aerosols in the upper atmosphere is believed to be a method that can quickly counter global warming. However, this is not the case, new research reveals.
In a paper appearing in Nature Geoscience, Kate Ricke, a climate physicist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and her team show, by modelling, that solar-radiation management could not only reduce rainfall in the long term, but its effects will also vary across regions. Some places will be over-cooled by atmospheric changes, which are too minor to be effective for their neighbours.
The gases under consideration are sulphur compounds that would produce sulphate aerosols in the upper atmosphere. Geoengineering advocates have suggested injecting large quantities of these materials into the stratosphere, either by shooting them up in artillery shells or releasing them from high-flying aeroplanes. Once there, they would disperse into a thin, bright haze that would reflect enough sunlight back into space to partially or completely offset global warming.
According to the new study, it is quite easy to design sulphate-injection scenarios that keep the temperature stable until 2080. But, the change in sunlight alters other weather patterns.
“It changes the distribution of energy in the troposphere so that it becomes more convectively stable,” Nature quoted Ricke, as saying. Consequently, precipitation decreases.
Regional effects are also important. For example, Ricke said, her research demonstrates that levels of sulphate that kept China closest to its baseline climate were so high that they made India cold and wet. Those that were best for India raised the mercury levels in China. However, both countries fared better either way than under a no-geoengineering policy, she said.
The researchers also found that all of these effects get worse with time.
Ricke said: “The compensation is imperfect. The longer you do it, the more imperfect it becomes.”
This type of geoengineering is at best a temporary fix - something people working in the field had always known because it does nothing to prevent the accumulation of CO2 and the resulting acidification of the oceans.
“But it might be even more temporary than people had expected,” Rickie said. (ANI)
- Scientist offers better ways to engineer Earth's climate to prevent global warming - Sep 08, 2010
- Geoengineering 'can't just slam on the brakes' on rising sea levels - Aug 24, 2010
- Simulating volcanic eruptions can save Earth from global warming - Jan 28, 2010
- Deflecting solar rays could improve food supply - Jan 23, 2012
- Sea levels to rise upto 70 cm by 2100 - Aug 25, 2010
- 'Block the sun, control global warming' - Jan 30, 2010
- Man-made volcanoes may cool Earth by reflecting sunlight back into space - Aug 30, 2009
- Global sunscreen might cool Earth, but it won't save corals - Jun 17, 2009
- Geoengineering may endanger marine life by decreasing oxygen in lakes - Feb 08, 2010
- Halting greenhouse gas emissions would still make Earth warmer - Feb 16, 2011
- Plans to make artificial clouds to fight global warming may backfire - Jun 07, 2010
- Crops reflecting sunlight could offset global warming - Nov 09, 2010
- Human-induced global warming requires long-term study - Nov 20, 2011
- Sulphuric acid formation affects climate, health - Aug 09, 2012
- 'Rising CO2 levels threaten aquatic food webs' - May 08, 2012
Tags: aeroplanes, artillery shells, atmospheric changes, carnegie mellon university, global warming, mercury levels, physicist, pittsburgh pennsylvania, radiation management, regional effects, ricke, solar radiation, stable nature, stratosphere, sulphate aerosols, sulphur compounds, temperature stable, troposphere, upper atmosphere, weather patterns